Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty

References

• Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1485–1496Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Jaffray J.-Y., Saïd T. Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1987) 39:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75:643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein L. G. A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:579–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etchart-Vincent N. Traitement subjectif du risque et comportement individuel devant les pertes: une étude expérimentale. (2003) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, GRID-ENSAM, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Etchart-Vincent N. Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. J. Risk Uncertainty (2004) 28:217–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennema H., van Assen M. Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 17:277–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Tversky A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:585–603Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Tversky A. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1998) 44:879–895Link, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Rogers B. A., Tversky A. Option traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty (1996) 13:5–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I. Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J. Math. Econom. (1987) 16:65–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18:141–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein W. M., Einhorn H. J. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94:236–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica (1991) 59:667–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey J. D., Luini L. Estimating (risk) preference functionals using experimental methods. Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and Experiments (1999) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 109–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey J. D., Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica (1994) 62:1291–1326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karmarkar U. S. Subjectively weighted utility: A descriptive extension of the expected utility model. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1978) 21:61–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilka M., Weber M. What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. (2001) 47:1712–1726Link, Google Scholar
• Lattimore P. K., Baker J. R., Witte A. D. The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1992) 17:377–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes L. L., Oden G. C. The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. J. Math. Psych. (1999) 43:286–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66:497–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica (2000) 68:1281–1292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1954) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica (1989) 57:571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens S. S. On the psychophysical power law. Psych. Rev. (1957) 64:153–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. J. Experiment. Psych. (1967) 75:27–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Fox C. R. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102:269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101:547–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Wakker P. P. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica (1995) 63:1255–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P. Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle. Econometrica (2001) 69:1039–1059Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P. On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111:236–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker P. P., Deneffe D. Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1131–1150Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1676–1690Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1999) 45:74–85Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Zhang J., Gonzalez R., Koehler D. J., Harvey N. Decision under risk. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004) (Blackwell, MA) 399–423Crossref, Google Scholar