Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0389

References

  • Brewer M. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17:475–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M., Gardner W. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71:83–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Relational equilibrium in a social typology. J. Math. Sociology (1979) 6:211–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action (1982) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Network items and the general social survey. Soc. Networks (1984) 6:293–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. A note on social capital and network content. Soc. Networks (1997) 19:355–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne D., Berkowitz L. Attitudes and attraction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1969) 4(Academic Press, New York) 35–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G., Hannan M.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J., Polzer J., Barsade S., Neale M. A. Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:749–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobrev S., Kim T., Hannan M. Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. Amer. J. Sociology (2001) 106:1299–1337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B. Jackknife-after-bootstrap standard errors and influence functions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. (1992) 54:83–127Series B (Methodological)Google Scholar
  • Ely R. J. The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:203–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely R. J. The power of demography: Women’s social constructions of gender in identity at work. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:589–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely R., Thomas D. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:229–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7:117–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer C.To Dwell Among Friends (1982) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grieve P., Hogg M. Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1999) 25:926–940CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M. The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. (1992) (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hogg M. Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. (1993) 4:85–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M., Hains S. C. Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70:295–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M., Hardie E. A. Social attraction, personal attraction and self-categorization: A field study. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17:175–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg M., Turner J. C. Interpersonal attraction, social identification, and psychological group formation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1985) 15:51–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:422–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:673–703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1997) 60:91–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977a) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociology (1977b) 82:965–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kram K., Isabella L. Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28:110–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E. O.Prestige and Association in an Urban Community (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Laumann E. O.Bonds of Pluralism (1973) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lawrence B. The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence B. Homophily: Methods and meanings. (2001) 18–66Working paper, Anderson School, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarsfeld P. F., Merton R. K., Berger Monroe, Abel Theodore, Page Charles H. Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Nostrand, Toronto, Canada) Google Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Miller J. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:181–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. Core discussion networks of Americans. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1987) 52:122–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Campbell K. E. Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces (1984) 63:482–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire W. J., Padawer-Singer A. Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 33:743–754CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire W. J., McGuire C. V., Winton W. Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one’s gender in the spontaneous self-concept. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1979) 15:77–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire W. J., McGuire C. V., Child P., Fujioka T. Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36:511–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociology (2001) 27:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:441–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1968) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miller J., Lincoln J. R., Olson J. Rationality and equity in professional networks: Gender and race as factors in the stratification of interorganizational systems. Amer. J. Sociology (1981) 87:308–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S. Similarity of political behavior among large American corporations. Amer. J. Sociology (1989) 95:401–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi M. S., Koenig T. Economic concentration and corporate political behavior: A cross-industry comparison. Soc. Sci. Res. (1988) 17:287–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Cummings L. L., Staw Barry M. Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior (1982) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 299–357Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J. Organizational demography: Implications for management. California Management Rev. (1985) 28:67–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J., Milton L., Swann W. Capitalizing on diversity: Congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:296–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Burt R. S. Homophily, legitimation, and competition: Bias in managerial peer evaluations. (2002) . Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. Networks, diversity and performance: The social capital of R&D units. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E., McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks versus demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:101–133Google Scholar
  • Simpson W. The quadratic assignment procedure (QAP). (2001) . Paper presented at STATA First North American Meeting, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Skvoretz J. Salience, heterogeneity and consolidations of parameters: Civilizing Blau’s primitive theory. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1983) 48:360–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tafjel H., Turner J. C., Austin W. G., Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA) 33–53Google Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., Gutek B. A.Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future Directions (1999) (Lexington Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., O’Reilly III C. A. Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:402–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner J. C.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westphal J., Milton L. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:366–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O’Reilly C. A., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
  • Zatzick C., Elvira M., Cohen L. When is more better? The effects of racial composition on voluntary turnover. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:483–496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Lawrence B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.