Research Note—Price Discrimination After the Purchase: Rebates as State-Dependent Discounts

References

• Akerlof George A., Dickens William T. The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(June):307–319Google Scholar
• Allenby G., Rossi P. Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):185–204Link, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Neslin S. A.Sales Promotion (1990) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bulkeley William M. Rebates’ secret appeal to manufacturers: Few consumers actually redeem them. Wall Street Journal (1998) February 10):B1Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Moorthy S., Zhang J. Rebates as state-dependent discounts. (2003) . Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Dhar S. K., Hoch S. J. Price discrimination using in-store merchandising. J. Marketing (1996) 60(January):17–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmonston P. This Internet retailer’s watchword is “Free after rebate”: What’s the catch? Wall Street Journal (2001) March 5Google Scholar
• Fishburn Peter C., Balch M., McFadden D., Wu S. On the foundations of decision making under uncertainty. Essays on Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty (1974) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Gardner M. P. Mood states and consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 12(December):281–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner Eitan, Hess James D. A theory of channel price promotions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(4):872–886Google Scholar
• Greenwald A. G., Ronis D. L. Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: Case study of the evolution of a theory. Psych. Rev. (1978) 85:53–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. An evalution cost model of considerations sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(March):393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herriges Joseph A., Kling Catherine L. Nonlinear income effects in random utility models. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(1):62–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch Stephen, Wansink Brian, Kent Robert. When consumers space-out at point-of-purchase. (1997) . Paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Annual Conference, Tucson, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
• Houston Douglas A., Howe John S. An economic rationale for couponing. Quart. J. Bus. Econom. (1985) 24(2):37–49Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1996) 65(3):272–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden Daniel, Manski Charles F., McFadden Daniel. Econometric models of probabilitic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Moorthy Sridhar, Lu Qiang. Coupons versus rebates. (2004) . Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Moraga-Gonzalez Jose L., Petrakis Emmanuel. Coupon advertising under imperfect price information. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(4):523–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan Chakravarthi. A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(Spring):128–147Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver Richard L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(December):418–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen Sherwin. Manufactured inequality. J. Labor Econom. (1997) 15(2):189–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singleton Janet. Mail-in rebates aren’t worth the trouble for most consumers. Denver Post (2001) May 6):D8Google Scholar
• Soman D. The illusion of delayed incentives: Evaluating future effort-money transactions. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(November):427–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spencer Jane. As cash back offers multiple, so do obstacles for consumers. Wall Street Journal (2002) June 11Google Scholar
• Taylor Shelley. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(1):67–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thurstone L. L. Psychological analysis. Amer. J. Psych. (1927) 38:368–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian Hal R.Microeconomic Analysis (1992) 3rd ed.(W.W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. Kip, Evans William N. Utility functions that depend on health status: Estimates and economic implications. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(June):353–374Google Scholar
• Westbrook Robert A. Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. J. Marketing Res. (1987) 24(August):258–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wildasin David E. Spatial variation of the marginal utility of income and unequal treatment of equals. J. Urban Econom. (1986) 19(January):125–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Jinhong, Shugan Steve. Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(Summer):219–243Link, Google Scholar