A Partially Observed Markov Decision Process for Dynamic Pricing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0393

References

  • Astrom K. Optimal control of Markov processes with incomplete state information. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1965) 10:174–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y., Pazgal A. Pricing of short life-cycle products through active learning. (2002) . Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  • Balvers R. J., Cosimano T. F. Actively learning about demand and the dynamics of price adjustments. Econom. J. (1990) 100:882–898Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P. Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control (1995) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bitran R. G., Mondschein S. V. Periodic pricing of seasonal products in retailing. Management Sci. (1997) 43:64–79LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Braden D. J., Oren S. S. Nonlinear pricing to produce information. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):310–326LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carvalho A. X., Puterman M. L. Dynamic pricing and learning over short time horizons. (2003) . Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Desiraju R., Shugan S. M. Strategic service pricing and yield management. J. Marketing (1999) 63(1):44–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Heching A. Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1999) 47:454–475LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L., Raman A., McClelland A. Rocket science retailing is almost here—Are you ready. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) July–August):115–124Google Scholar
  • Gallego G., van Ryzin G. Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Sci. (1994) 40:999–1020LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hammond J. H., Raman A. (1996) . Sport Obermeyer, Ltd. Case study 9-695-022, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Hu C., Lovejoy W. S., Shafer S. L. Comparison of some sub-optimal control policies in medical drug therapy. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(5):696–709LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson M. E. Learning from toys: Lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(3):106–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane D. E. A partially observed model for decision making by fishermen. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(2):240–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. L. Stalking information: Bayesian inventory management with unobserved lost sales. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):346–363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. A stochastic theory of the firm. Math. Oper. Res. (1988) 13:447–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. Computationally feasible bounds for partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1991) 39(1):162–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. Suboptimal policies, with bounds, for parameter adaptive decision processes. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(3):583–599LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan G. E. A survey of partially observable Markov decision processes: Theory, models, and algorithms. Management Sci. (1982) 28(1):1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petruzzi N. C., Dada M. Dynamic pricing and inventory control with learning. Naval Res. Logist. (2002) 49:303–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi S. P., Cheng F. Optimality of (s, S) policies in inventory models with Markovian demand. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(6):931–939LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smallwood R. D., Sondik E. J. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes over a finite horizon. Oper. Res. (1973) 21:1071–1088LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sondik E. The optimal control of partially observable Markov processes. (1971) . Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Zipkin P. Inventory control in a fluctuating demand environment. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(2):351–370LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Treharne J. T., Sox C. R. Adaptive inventory control for nonstationary demand and partial information. Management Sci. (2002) 48(5):607–624LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Hee K. M. (1978) . Bayesian control of Markov chains. Mathematical Centre Tract 95, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C. Applications of two inequality results for concave functions to a stochastic optimization problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1976) 55:347–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White C. C., Scherer W. T. Solution procedures for partially observed Markov decision processes. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(5):791–797LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ziya S., Ayhan H., Foley R. D. Technical note: Relationships among three assumptions in revenue management. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(5):804–809LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.