Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design

References

• Adams W. J., Yellen J. L. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90(August):475–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. (2002) (Mimeo, Nuffield College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B. Competing technologies increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99:116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B.Increasing Returns and Path-Dependence in the Economy (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1613–1630Link, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B., Jullien B. Chicken & egg: Competing matchmakers. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):309–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhri V. Pricing and efficiency of a circulation industry: The case of newspapers. Inform. Econom. Policy (1998) 10:59–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The problem of social justice. J. Law Econom. (1960) 3:1–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cournot A. A. Recherches sur les principes mathematiques de la theorie des richesses. (1838) . Libraririe des sciences politiques et sociales M. Rivere & cie. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
• DeGraba P. Why lever into a zero profit industry: Tying foreclosure, and exclusion. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5(3):433–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(1):70–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Predation, product preannouncements and innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):940–955Google Scholar
• Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y. M. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from Web server pricing. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):303–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansell S. Red face for the Internet’s blue chip. (2001) March 11(New York Times)Google Scholar
• Jackson T. P.U.S. v. Microsoft: Findings of Fact (1999) (United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(2):133–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mongell S., Roth A. E. Sorority rush as a two-sided matching mechanism. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(3):441–464Google Scholar
• Nalebuff B. Bundling. Yale ICF working paper series 99-14. (1999) . http://ssrn.com/abstract=185193Google Scholar
• Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Information complements, substitutes, and strategic product design. (1999) Workshop on Information Systems and EconomicsCharlotte, NC http://ssrn.com/abstract=249585Google Scholar
• Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Unbundling in the presence of internetwork externalities. (2001) . Mimeo, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. (2000) . Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Two-sided markets: An overview. (2004) . Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Salinger M. A graphical analysis of bundling. J. Bus. (1995) 68(1):85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. The art of standards wars. California Management Rev. (1999) 41(2):8–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian H. Sequential provision of public goods. J. Public Econom. (1989) 53:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whinston M. Tying,foreclosure, and exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(4):837–859Google Scholar