Your Money or Your Life: A Prescriptive Model for Health, Safety, and Consumption Decisions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0402

References

  • Arias E. United States life table. National Vital Statist. Rep. (2004) 52(14):1–40Google Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Quiggin J. Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: When is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? J. Health Econom. (1999) 18(6):681–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Quiggin J. Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: A reply to Klose. J. Health Econom. (2002) 21(1):167–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dranove D.What’s Your Life Worth? (2003) (FT Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Furlong W. J., Feeny D. H., Torrance G. W., Barr R. D. The health utilities index (Hui) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann. Medicine (2001) 33(5):375–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gold M. R., Siegel J. E., Russell L. B., Weinstein M. C.Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammitt J. K. QALYs versus WTP. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(5):985–1001CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hazen G. Multiattribute structure for QALYs. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):205–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A., Schwing J. Richard C., Albers Walter A. On making life and death decisions. Societal Risk Assessment, How Safe Is Safe Enough? (1980) (General Motors Research Laboratories, Plenum Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A. On fates comparable to death. Management Sci. (1984) 30(4):407–422LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnston S. C., Gress D. R., Kahn J. G. Which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated? A cost-utility analysis. Neurology (1999) 52(9):1806–1815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Krupnick A. J.Valuing Health Outcomes: Policy Choices and Technical Issues (2004) (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Miyamoto J. M., Wakker P. P., Bleichrodt H., Peters H. J. M. The zero-condition: A simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):839–849LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prosser L. A., Stinnett A. A., Goldman P. A., Williams L. W., Hunink M. G. M., Goldman L., Weinstein M. C. Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapies according to selected patient characteristics. Ann. Internal Medicine (2000) 132(10):769–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepard D. S., Zeckhauser R. J. Survival versus consumption. Management Sci. (1984) 30(4):423–439LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J. E. Evaluating income streams: A decision analysis approach. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1690–1708LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sox H. C., Blatt M. A., Higgins M. C., Marton K. I.Medical Decision Making (1988) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA) Google Scholar
  • Torrance G. W., Boyle M. H., Horwood S. P. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(6):1043–1069LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein M. C., Coxson P. G., Williams L. W., Pass T. M., Stason W. B., Goldman L. Forecasting coronary heart disease incidence, mortality, and cost: The coronary heart disease policy model. Amer. J. Public Health (1987) 77(11):1417–1426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.