Entry by Spinoffs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0411

References

  • Agarwal Rajshree, Echambadi Raj, Franco April M., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich Howard. Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage Publications Limited, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Anton James J., Yao Dennis A. Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1995) 11:362–378Google Scholar
  • Bankman Joseph, Gilson Ronald J. Why start-ups? Stanford Law Rev. (1999) 51:289–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett William P., Burgelman Robert. Evolutionary perspectives on strategy. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhide Amar V.The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braden Patricia L.Technological Entrepreneurship (1977) (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Braun Ernest, MacDonald Stuart. Revolution in Miniature (1978) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Brittain Jack W., Freeman John. Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. (1986) . MimeoGoogle Scholar
  • Bromberg Joan Lisa. The Laser in America, 1950–1970 (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cassiman Bruno, Ueda Masako. Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. (2003) . MimeoGoogle Scholar
  • Chamberlain Gary. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1980) 47:225–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough Henry. Arrested development: The experience of European hard disk drive firms in comparison with US and Japanese firms. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1999) 9:287–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen Clay M. The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1993) 67:531–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen Wesley M., Klepper Steven. The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. J. Small Bus. Econom. (1992) 4:1–14Google Scholar
  • Cooper Arnold C., Hornaday John A., Tardley Jr. Fred A., Timmons Jeffry A., Vesper Karl H. Contrasts in the role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented companies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1984 (1984) (Babson College, Wellesley, MA) 159–174Google Scholar
  • Cooper Arnold C., Sexton Donald L., Smilor Raymond W. Entrepreneurship and high technology. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (1986) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 153–168Google Scholar
  • Franco April M., Filson Darren. (2000) . Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Staff Report 272, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Garvin David A. Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. California Management Rev. (1983) 25(January):3–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski Paul. What do we know about entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1995) 13:421–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene William H.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Harbison James P., Nahory Robert E.Lasers, Harnessing the Atom’s Light (1997) (Scientific American Library, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hecht Jeff. The Laser Guidebook (1992) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hellman Thomas. When do employees become entrepreneurs? Incentives, corporate strategy, and intellectual property rights. (2002) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Holbrook Daniel, Cohen Wesley M., Hounshell David, Klepper Steven. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1017–1041CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson Tim. Inside Intel (1998) (Penguin Putnam, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kazanjian Robert K., Drazin Robert. An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1489–1503LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper Steven. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:562–583Google Scholar
  • Klepper Steven. Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. RAND J. Econom. (2002a) 33:37–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper Steven. Agglomeration through spinoffs: How Detroit became the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. (2002b) . MimeoGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper Steven, Simons Kenneth L. Technological extinctions of industrial firms: An enquiry into their nature and causes. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6:379–460CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper Steven, Sleeper Sally. Entry by spinoffs. (2000) . MimeoGoogle Scholar
  • Review and outlook, 1974Laser Focus (1974) January):20–40Google Scholar
  • Malone Michael. The Big Score (1985) (Doubleday & Company, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
  • Miller Danny, Friesen Peter H. A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1161–1183LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitton Donald G., Churchill Neil C., Bygrave William D., Hornaday John A., Muzyka Daniel F., Vespter Karl H., Wetzel Jr. William E. Bring on the clones: A longitudinal study of the proliferation, development, and growth of the biotech industry in San Diego. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1990 (1990) (Babson College, Wellesley, MA) 344–358Google Scholar
  • Moore Gordon, Davis Kevin, Bresnahan Timothy, Gambardella Alfonso. Learning the Silicon Valley way. Building High-Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson Richard R. Assessing private enterprise: An exegesis of tangled doctrine. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 9:524–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson Richard R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Res. Policy (1990) 19:193–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson Richard R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. J. Econom. Lit. (1995) 33(March):48–90Google Scholar
  • Nelson Richard R., Winter Sidney G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pakes Ariel, Nitzan Shmuel. Optimal contracts for research personnel, research employment, and the establishment of “rival” enterprises. J. Labor Econom. (1983) 1:345–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prescott Edward C., Visscher Michael. Sequential location among firms with foresight. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8:378–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts Edward B.Entrepreneurs in High Technology (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Semiconductor Products A directory of laser organizations. (1963) August):48–62Google Scholar
  • Stuart Toby E., Sorenson Olav. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:175–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece David J., Rumelt Richard, Dosi Giovanni, Winter Sidney. Understanding corporate coherence. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1994) 25:1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas Publishing CompanyThomas Register of American Manufacturers (1963–1966) (Thomas Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Utterback James M., Abernathy William J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega (1975) 3:639–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.