Step-Level Reasoning and Bidding in Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0423

References

  • Abrams E., Sefton M., Yavas A. An experimental comparison of two search models. Econom. Theory (2000) 16:735–749Google Scholar
  • Andreoni J., Miller J. H. Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica (2002) 70(2):737–753CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baye M., Morgan J. Price dispersion in the lab and on the Internet: Theory and evidence. RAND (2004) 35(3):449–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bornstein G., Gneezy U. Price competition between teams. Experiment. Econom. (2002) 5(1):29–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bosch-Domenech J. Garcia-Montalvo, Nagel R., Satorra A.Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 1687–1701One, two, (three), infinity,…: Newspaper and lab beauty-contest experimentsGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho T.-H., Chong J. K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho T.-H., Chong J. K., Huck Steffen. Behavioral game theory: Thinking, learning, and teaching. Essays in Honor of Werner Guth (2005) (Palgrave Press, UK) Google Scholar
  • Charness Rabin. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117:817–869CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa-Gomes M., Crawford V. (2004) . Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Discussion paper 2004-11, University of California, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Costa-Gomes M., Crawford V., Broseta B. Cognition and behavior in normal form games: An experimental study. Econometrica (2001) 69:1193–1235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duffy J., Nagel R. On the robustness of behavior in experimental “beauty contest” games. Econom. J. (1997) 107:1684–1700Google Scholar
  • Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Price competition and market concentration: An experimental study. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2000) 18:7–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U. Information disclosure in auctions: An experiment. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2002) 48:431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E. Identification and testing of modes in beliefs. J. Math. Psych. (2002) 46(1):88–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E., Stahl D. O., Wilson P. Modeling and testing for heterogeneity in observed strategic behavior. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2001) 83:146–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T.-H., Camerer C., Weigelt K. Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental p-beauty contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:947–969Google Scholar
  • Isaac R. M., Walker J. M. Information and conspiracy in sealed bid auctions. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1985) 6:139–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J., Levin D.Common Value Auctions and the Winner's Curse (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D. Vickrey auctions in practice: From nineteenth-century philately to twenty-first-century e-commerce. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):183–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maynard Smith J., Price G. R. The logic of animal conflict. Nature (1973) 246:15–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey R. D., Palfrey T. R. An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica (1992) 60(4):803–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagel R. Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85:1313–1326Google Scholar
  • Palfrey T. R., Prisbrey J. E. Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: How much and why. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(5):829–846Google Scholar
  • Slonim R. L. Competing against experienced and inexperienced players. Experiment. Econom. (2005) 8:55–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonsino D. I. Erev, Gilat S. On rationality, learning, and zero-sum betting—An experimental study of the no betting conjecture. (2000) (Israel Institute of Technology, Mimeo, Technion) Google Scholar
  • Stahl D. O. Evolution of smartnn players. Games Econom. Behavior (1993) 5:604–617CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl D. O., Wilson P. Experimental evidence of players' models of other players. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1994) 25:309–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl D. O., Wilson P. On players' models of other players: Theory and evidence. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10:213–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Damme E.Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria (1987) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16:8–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vulkan N.The Economics of E-Commerce (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.