Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams

References

• Anderson E. W., Fornell C., Rust R. T. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(2):129–145Link, Google Scholar
• Allen N. J., Grisaffe D. B. Employee commitment to the organization and customer reactions: Mapping the linkages. Human Resource Management Rev. (2001) 11(3):209–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batt R. Work organization, technology and performance in customer service and sales. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1999) 52(4):539–563Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M.EQS Structural Equations Program Manual (1995) (Multivariate Software, Inc., Encino, CA) Google Scholar
• Berry L. L., Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. Improving service quality in America: Lessons learned. Acad. Management Executive (1994) 8(2):32–45Google Scholar
• Blau P.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 349–381Google Scholar
• Bottomley P. A., Holden S. J. S. Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:494–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burr R., Cordery J. L. Self-management efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between job design and performance. Human Performance (2001) 14:27–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campion M. A., Medsker G. J., Higgs C. A. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work teams. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46:823–850Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campion M. A., Papper E. M., Medsker G. J. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psych. (1996) 49(2):429–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan D. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83(2):234–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364Link, Google Scholar
• de Jong A., de Ruyter J. C., Lemmink J. G. A. M. Antecedents and consequences of the service climate in boundary-spanning self-managing service teams. J. Marketing (2004) 68(2):18–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeter-Schmelz D. R., Ramsey R. P. An investigation of team information processing in service teams: Exploring the link between teams and customers. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2003) 31(4):409–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emery C. R., Fredenhall L. D. The effect of teams on firm profitability and customer satisfaction. J. Service Res. (2002) 4(3):217–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson L. L., Shalley C. E., Blum T. C. Team and organizational attitudes as a lens and mirror impacting customer satisfaction: An empirical test in self-managed teams. J. Quality Management (2001) 6:235–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladstein D. L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):499–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product teams. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):360–373Link, Google Scholar
• Gully S. M., Joshi A., Incalcaterra K. A., Beaubien J. M. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(5):819–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guzzo R. A., Shea G. P., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 3(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 269–313Google Scholar
• Guzzo R. A., Yost P. R., Campbell R. J., Shea G. P. Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British J. Soc. Psych. (1993) 32:87–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Group influences on individuals in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 199–267Google Scholar
• Hartline M. D., Ferrell O. C. The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing (1996) 60(4):52–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., LePine J. A., Colquitt J. A., Hedlund J. Extending the multilevel theory of team decision making: Effects of feedback and experience in hierarchical teams. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(3):269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hope Pelled L., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horwitz F., Neville M. A. Organization design for service excellence: A review of the literature. Human Resource Management (1996) 35(4):471–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyatt D. E., Ruddy T. M. An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psych. (1997) 50:553–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D., Swartz T. A., Bowen D. E., Brown S. W. Services: What do we know and where shall we go? A view from marketing. Advances in Service Marketing and Management (1998) 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–96Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J. A. Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. Group Process and Productivity (1992) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 138–173Google Scholar
• James L. R. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J. Appl. Psych. (1982) 67(2):219–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis I. L., Mann L.Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (1977) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Janz B. D., Colquitt J. A., Noe R. A. Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psych. (1997) 50:877–904Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why some differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jex Steve M., Bliese Paul D. Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. J. Appl. Psych (1999) 84(3):349–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung D. I., Sosik J. Group potency and collective efficacy: Examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Group Organ. Management (2003) 28(3):366–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keck S. L. Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):143–156Link, Google Scholar
• Kim P. H. When private beliefs shape collective reality: The effects of co-worker expectations on group behavior and performance. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):801–815Link, Google Scholar
• Kim P. H. When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(February):165–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Rosen B., Woodman R. W., Pasmore W. A. A model of work team empowerment. Research in Organizational Change and Development (1997) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 131–167Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Rosen B. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(1):58–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lam S. K., Chen X., Schaubroeck J. Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(5):905–914Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lance C. E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1988) 12:163–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C., Tinsley C. H., Bobko P. An investigation of the antecedents and consequences of group-level confidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2002) 32(8):1628–1652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester S. W., Meglino B. M., Korsgaard M. A. The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(2):352–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Brandt C. J. Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(3):331–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martocchio J. J. Age-related differences in employee absenteeism: A meta-analytic review. Psych. Aging (1989) 4:409–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Mathieu J. E., Bartlett A. L. Technical-administrative task performance, leadership performance and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team-and task-related composition variables. J. Organ. Behavior (2002) 23:795–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer M. W., Gupta V. The performance paradox. Res. Organ. Behavior (1995) 16(3):309–369Google Scholar
• Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1996) (Irwin, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H.Psychometric Theory (1994) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ostroff C., Kinicki A. J., Clark M. A. Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: An example of climate-satisfaction relationship. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(2):355–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing (1988) 64(1):12–40Google Scholar
• Pearce C. L., Gallagher C. A., Ensley M. D. Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (2002) 75:115–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinto M. B., Pinto J. K., Prescott J. E. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Sci. (1993) 39(10):1281–1295Link, Google Scholar
• Polley D., Van Dyne L., Beyerlein M. M., Johnson D. A. The limits and liabilities of self-managing work teams. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams (1994) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–38Google Scholar
• Prussia G. E., Kinicki A. J. A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(2):187–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quattrone G. A., Jones E. E. The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 38(1):141–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rasbash J., Browne W., Goldstein H., Yang M., Plewis I., Healy M., Woodhouse G., Draper D., Langford I., Lewis T.A User's Guide to MlwiN (2000) (Multilevel Models Project Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Sayles L. R.Behavior in Industrial Work Groups: Prediction and Control (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L., Wienk J. A. Reflexivity and diversity in teams: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity. J. Organ. Behavior (2003) 24:779–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Salvaggio A. N., Subirats M. Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(2):220–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sergeant A., Frenkel S. When do customer contact employees satisfy customers. J. Service Res. (2002) 3(1):18–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shea G. P., Guzzo R. A. Group effectiveness: What really matters. Sloan Management Rev. (1987) 28:25–31Google Scholar
• Singh J. Performance productivity and quality of frontline employees in service organizations. J. Marketing (2000) 64(2):15–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam N., Murry W. D., Aviolo B. J., Jung D. I. A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group Organ. Management (2002) 27(1):66–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., Bosker R. J.Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (1999) (Sage Publications, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Sosik J. J., Aviolo B. J., Kahai S. S. Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82:89–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart G. L., Barrick M. R. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(2):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vancouver J. B., Millsap R. E., Peters P. A. Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(5):666–679Crossref, Google Scholar