The Effects of Imprecise Probabilities and Outcomes in Evaluating Investment Options

References

• Anilowski C., Feng M., Skinner D. J. Is guidance a macro factor? The nature and information content of aggregate earnings guidance. (2004) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Banz Rolf. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J. Financial Econom. (1981) 9(1):3–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Thaler R., Constantinides G. M., Harris M., Stulz R. A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (2003) (Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1052–1090Google Scholar
• Barry C. B., Brown S. J. Differential information and security market equilibrium. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1985) 20(4):407–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartov E., Givoly D., Hayn C. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. J. Accounting Econom. (2002) 33:173–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S. Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J. Finance (2001) 56:1747–1764Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:75–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Templin S. Valuation of vague prospects with mixed outcomes. (2004) Minneapolis, MNPaper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society of Judgment and Decision MakingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Wallsten T. S., Busemeyer J., Hastie R., Medin D. L. Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (1995) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 275–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Weinberg S., Wallsten T. S. Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1988) 14:281–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Kuhn K. M., Kramer K. M., Johnson T. Modeling certainty equivalents for imprecise gambles. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2002) 88:748–768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:325–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casey J. T., Scholz J. T. Boundary effects of vague risk information on taxpayer decisions. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:360–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z., Epstein L. G. Ambiguity, risk and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica (2002) 70:1403–1443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Jaffray J. Y., Said T. Individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty: An experimental study. Theory Decision (1985) 18:203–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crum R. L., Laughhunn D. J., Payne J. W. Risk seeking behavior and its implications for financial models. Financial Management (1981) 10:20–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curley S. P., Yates J. F. The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preferences. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1985) 50:360–394Google Scholar
• Curley S. P., Yates J. F., Abrams R. A. Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1986) 38:230–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Degeorge F., Patel J., Zeckhauser R. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. J. Bus. (1999) 72:1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du N. Reducing information asymmetry or managing earnings expectations: Can investors detect managers’ intent in voluntary disclosures. (2005) . Working paper, DePaul University, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Du N., Shelley M. An experimental investigation of the effects of ambiguity, incentives and relationship on analysts’ forecast revision decisions and managers’ guidance. (2005) . Working paper, DePaul University, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92:433–461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75:643–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Hawkins S. A. Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility and the prominence effect. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1993) 19:580–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Tversky A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:879–895Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox C. R., Weber M. Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2002) 88:476–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• French K., Poterba J. Investor diversification and international equity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81:222–226Google Scholar
• Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. (1989) 18:141–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Vallejo C., Bonazzi A., Shapiro A. J. Effects of vague probabilities and of vague payoffs on preference: A model comparison analysis. J. Math. Psych. (1996) 40:130–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodder L. E., Koonce L., McAnally M. L. SEC market risk disclosures: Implications for judgment and decision making. Accounting Horizon (2001) 15:49–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Sci. (1990) 36:780–803Link, Google Scholar
• Huberman G. Familiarity breeds investment. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14:659–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G., Gerritsen L. E. M. On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica (1999) 103:149–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer K., Budescu D. V., Zwick R., Rapoport A. Exploring Ellsberg’s paradox in vague-vague cases. Experimental Business Research (2004) III(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA and Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 131–154Google Scholar
• Kuhn K. M., Budescu D. V. The relative importance of probabilities, outcomes, and vagueness in hazard risk decisions. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1996) 68:301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn K., Budescu D. V., Hershey J. R., Kramer K. M., Rantilla A. K. Attribute tradeoffs in low probability/high consequence risks: The joint effects of dimension preference and vagueness. Risk Decision Policy (1999) 4:32–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H., Meszaros J., Hogarth R. M., Spranca M. Ambiguity and underwriter decision processes. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1995) 26:337–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., Gaeth G. J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1998) 76:149–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. J. Experiment. Psych. (1971) 89:46–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maenhout P. Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 17(4):951–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
• Matsumoto D. A. Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Accounting Rev. (2002) 77:483–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukerji S., Tallon J. Ambiguity aversion and incompleteness of financial markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2001) 68:883–904Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsen R. A., Troughton G. H. Are risk premium anomalies caused by ambiguity? Financial Analysts J. (2000) 56(2):25–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R. K., Weber M. Effects of ambiguity in market experiments. Management Sci. (1993) 39:602–615Link, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker P. J. H. Preferences for information on probabilities versus prizes: The role of risk-taking attitudes. J. Risk Uncertainty (1989) 2:37–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker P. J. H. Choices involving uncertain probabilities: Tests of generalized utility models. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1991) 16:295–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The construction of preferences. Amer. Psychologist (1995) 50:364–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 26:297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95:371–384Crossref, Google Scholar