Investment Decisions and Time Horizon: Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Repeated Gambles

References

• Albrecht P., Maurer R., Ruckpaul U. Shortfall-risks of stocks in the long run. Financial Markets Portfolio Management (2001) 15:481–499Google Scholar
• Becker G., DeGroot M., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Sci. (1963) 9:226–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Sci. (1999) 45:364–381Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. How much is investor autonomy worth? J. Finance (2002) 57:1593–1616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brachinger H.-W., Weber M. Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk. OR Spektrum (1997) 19:235–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S., Price B.Regression Analysis by Example (1991) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Goldstein W., Weber E. U., Busemeyer J., Hastie R., Medin D. Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (1995) (Academic Press, New York) 83–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin D., Brenner L., Koehler D., Harvey N. Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 177–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gujarati D.Basic Econometrics (1995) (McGraw-Hill, Singapore) Google Scholar
• Hertwig R., Barron G., Erev I., Weber E. U. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15:534–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtgrave D., Weber E. U. Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Anal. (1993) 13:553–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joag S., Mowen J., Gentry J. Risk perception in a simulated industrial purchasing task: The effects of single versus multi-play decisions. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1990) 3:91–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefer D., Bodily S. Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. Management Sci. (1983) 29:595–609Link, Google Scholar
• Keller C. R., Sarin R. K., Weber M. Empirical investigation of some properties of the perceived riskiness of gambles. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1986) 38:114–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilka M., Weber M. What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. (2001) 47:1712–1726Link, Google Scholar
• Klos A. The investment horizon and dynamic asset allocation—Some experimental evidence. Econom. Lett. (2004) 85:167–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klos A., Weber M. Portfolio choice in the presence of nontradeable income: An experimental analysis. German Econom. Rev. (2006) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Kritzman M. What practitioners need to know about time diversification. Financial Anal. J. (1994) 50:14–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kritzman M., Rich D. The mismeasurement of risk. Financial Anal. J. (2002) 58:91–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer T., Weber M. Myopic prospect theory vs. myopic loss version—How general is the phenomenon? J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2005) 56:25–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L. D., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 306–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G., Weber E. U., Hsee C., Welch E. Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. (2001) 127:267–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes L., Oden G. The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. J. Math. Psych. (1999) 43:286–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce D., Weber E. U. An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. J. Math. Psych. (1986) 30:188–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7:77–91Google Scholar
• Montgomery H., Adelbratt T. Gambling decisions and information about expected value. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1982) 29:39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page E. B. Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: A significance test for linear ranks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1963) 58:216–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia (1963) 98:108–113Google Scholar
• Samuelson P., Anderson T. W., Karlin S. The √N law and repeated risk taking. Probability, Statistics, and Mathematics: Papers in Honor of Samuel Karlin (1989) (Academic Press, New York, Boston, MA) 291–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin R., Weber M. Risk-value models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 70:135–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafir S., Bechar A., Weber E. U. Cognition-mediated coevolution: Context-dependent evaluations and sensitivity of pollinators to variability in nectar rewards. Plant Systematics Evolution (2003) 238:195–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representations of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U. A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psych. (1988) 69:185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Marley A. The utility of measuring and modelling perceived risk. Choice, Decisions, and Measurements: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (1997) (Kluwer Academic Press, Norwell, MA) 45–57Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Smelser N., Baltes P. Decision and choice: Risk, empirical studies. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2001a) (Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford, UK) 13347–13351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Smelser N., Baltes P. Personality and risk taking. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2001b) (Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford, UK) 11274–11276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Hsee C. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1205–1217Link, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Milliman R. Perceived risk attitude: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Sci. (1997) 43:123–144Link, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Anderson C., Birnbaum M. A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1992) 52:492–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Blais A.-R., Betz N. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2002) 15:263–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Shafir S., Blais A.-R. Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111:430–445Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber E. U., Siebenmorgen N., Weber M. Communicating asset risk: How the format of historic volatility information affects risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Anal. (2005) 25:597–609Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M., Smelser N., Baltes P. Decision and choice: Risk, theories. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2001) (Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford, UK) 13364–13368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellek S. Computing exact p-values in Page’s nonparametric test against trend. Biometrie Inform. Med. Biol. (1989) 20:163–170Google Scholar