Skewness Preference, Risk Aversion, and the Precedence Relations on Stochastic Changes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0431

References

  • Arnold Barry C., Groeneveld Richard A. Measuring skewness with respect to the mode. Amer. Statist. (1995) 49(1):34–38Google Scholar
  • Arditti Fred D. Risk and the required return on equity. J. Finance (1967) 22(1):19–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briys Eric, Schlesinger Harris. Risk aversion and the propensities for self-insurance and self-protection. Southern Econom. J. (1990) 57:458–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockett Patrick L., Kahane Yehuda. Risk, return, skewness and preference. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):851–866LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chiu W. Henry. On the propensity to self-protect. J. Risk Insurance (2000) 67:555–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiu W. Henry. Degree of downside risk aversion and self-protection. Insurance: Math. Econom. (2004a) 36(1):93–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiu W. Henry. Intersecting Lorenz curves, the degree of downside inequality aversion, and tax reforms. (2004b) . Mimeo, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond Peter A., Stiglitz Joseph E. Increases in risk and in risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory (1974) 8:337–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt Louis, Gollier Christian, Schneider Thierry. Risk-aversion, prudence and temperance: A unified approach. Econom. Lett. (1995) 48:331–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrlich Isaac, Becker Gary. Market insurance, self-insurance and self-insurance. J. Political Econom. (1972) 80:623–648CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman Milton, Savage Leonard J. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econom. (1948) 56:279–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garrett Thomas A., Sobel Russel S. Gambler favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States’ lottery games. Econom. Lett. (1999) 63:85–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golec Joseph, Tamarkin Maurry. Bettor love skewness, not risk, at the horse track. J. Political Econom. (1998) 106:205–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey Campbell R., Siddique Akhtar. Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J. Finance (2000) 55(3):1263–1295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jewitt Ian. A note on comparative statics and stochastic dominance. J. Math. Econom. (1986) 15:246–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jewitt Ian. Choosing between risky prospects: The characterization of comparative static results, and location independent risk. Management Sci. (1989) 35(1):60–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball Miles. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58:53–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball Miles. Standard risk aversion. Econometrica (1993) 61:589–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraus Alan, Litzenberger Robert. Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. J. Finance (1976) 31(4):1085–1100Google Scholar
  • Leland Hayne E. Saving and uncertainty: The precautionary demand for saving. Quart. J. Econom. (1968) 82:465–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menezes C., Wang X. H. Increasing outer risk. J. Math. Econom. (2004a) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Menezes C., Wang X. H. On the risk-downside risk tradeoff. Manchester School (2004b) 72(2):179–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menezes C., Geiss C., Tressler J. Increasing downside risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:921–932Google Scholar
  • Oja Hannu. On location, scale, skewness and kurtosis of univariate distributions. Scand. J. Statist. (1981) 8:154–168Google Scholar
  • Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and the large. Econometrica (1964) 32(1–2):122–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt J. W. The logic of partial-risk aversion: Paradox lost. J. Risk Uncertainty (1990) 3:105–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross Stephen A. Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica (1981) 49(3):621–638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild Michael, Stiglitz Joseph. Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:225–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stone B.Risk, Return and Equilibrium (1970) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tsiang S. C. Rationale for mean-standard deviation analysis, skewness preference, and demand for money. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(3):354–371Google Scholar
  • Van Zwet W. R.Convex Transformations of Random Variables (1964) (Mathematical Centre Tracts 7, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.