Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0436

References

  • Anderson E., Fine C., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Business cycles and productivity in capital equipment supply chains. Quantitative Methods for Supply Chain Management (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) . Chapter 13Google Scholar
  • Anderson E., Morrice D. A simulation game for teaching service-oriented supply chain management: Does information sharing help managers with service capacity decisions? Production Oper. Management (2000) 9(1):40–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourland K., Powell S., Pyke D. Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 92:239–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. Managing supply chain variability with scheduled ordering policies. Management Sci. (1999) 45:843–856LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Lariviere M. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Sci. (1999) 45:1091–1108LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Echelon reorder points, installation reorder points, and the value of centralized demand information. Management Sci. (1998) 44:S221–S234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Sci. (1999) 45:1016–1090LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Samroengraja R. The stationary beer game. Production Oper. Management (2000) 9:19–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Drezner Z., Ryan J. K., Simchi-Levi D., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. The bullwhip effect: Managerial insights on the impact of forecasting and information on variability in a supply chain. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) . Chapter 14Google Scholar
  • Clark A. J., Scarf H. E. Optimal policies for a multi-echelon inventory problem. Management Sci. (1960) 6:475–490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl E., Sterman J. D. Effects of feedback complexity in dynamic decision making. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1995) 62:198–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A., Zipkin P. Computational issues in an infinite horizon, multi-echelon inventory model. Oper. Res. (1984) 32:818–836LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester J. Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1958) 36:37–66Google Scholar
  • Gavirneni S., Kapuscinski R., Tayur S. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. (1999) 45:16–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. C. A single-item inventory model for a nonstationary demand process. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (1999) 1:50–61LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth R.Judgment and Choice (1987) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hogarth R., Einhorn H. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24:1–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39:17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalidindi V. S. The web based beer distribution game: An application. (2001) . Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Kaminsky P., Simchi-Levi D., Lee H., Ng S. M. A new computerized beer distribution game: Teaching the value of integrated supply chain management. Global Supply Chain and Technology Management (1998) 1(The Production and Operations Management Society Series in Technology and Operations Management, Miami, FL) 216–225Google Scholar
  • Lee H., Padmanabhan P., Whang S. Information distortion in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. (1997a) 38:93–102Google Scholar
  • Lee H., Padmanabhan P., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997b) 43:546–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H., So K., Tang C. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46:626–643LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Paich M., Sterman J. D. Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1439–1457LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scheck S. Net tools could save automakers $1 billion. Electronic News (1998) 14(September):104Google Scholar
  • Schotter A., Weigelt K. Behavioral consequences of corporate incentives and long-term bonuses: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1280–1298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer M., Cachon G. Decision biases and learning in the newsvendor problem: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2000) 46:404–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seigel S.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (1965) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sengupta K., Abdel-Hamid T. Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision environments: An experimental investigation. Management Sci. (1993) 39:411–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sogomonian A., Tang C. A modeling framework for coordinating promotion and production decisions within a firm. Management Sci. (1993) 39:191–203LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steckel J., Gupta S., Banerji A. Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. (2004) 52(4):458–464LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stein T. SAP targets apparel. Information Week (1998) . Online (May 4) http://www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Sci. (1989a) 35:321–339LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1989b) 43:301–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Deterministic chaos in an experimental economic system. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1989c) 12:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Teaching takes off: Flight simulators for management education. OR/MS Today (1992) 19(5):40–44Google Scholar
  • Sterman J. D. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynam. Rev. (1994) 10:291–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.