Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms’ Incentives for Technology Licensing

References

• Amit R., Schoemaker P. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:33–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand B. N., Khanna T. The structure of licensing contracts. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48:103–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton J., Yao D. A. Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84:190–209Google Scholar
• Arora A. Contracting for tacit knowledge: The provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts. J. Development Econom. (1996) 50:233–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Fosfuri A. Licensing the market for technology. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2003) 52:277–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Gambardella A. The changing technology of technical change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor. Res. Policy (1994) 23:523–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Ceccagnoli M., Cohen W. M. R&D and the patent premium. (2003) . Working paper 9431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Arora A., Fosfuri A., Gambardella A.Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascavusoglu E., Zuniga M. P. Foreign patent rights, technology and disembodied knowledge transfer cross borders: An empirical application. (2002) . Unpublished manuscript, University of Paris, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Bowker Co. R. R.Directory of American Research and Technology (1995) 30th ed.(R. R. Bowker, New Providence) Google Scholar
• Branstetter L. G., Fisman R., Foley C. F. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92:1169–1184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M. Firm heterogeneity, imitation, and the incentives for cost reducing R&D effort. J. Indust. Econom. (2005) 53:83–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M. Patents and appropriation: Concerns, evidence and a Schumpeterian perspective. J. Tech. Transfer (2004) 30:57–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent or not. (2000) . Working paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• d’Aspremont C., Jacquemin A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78:1133–1137Google Scholar
• De Bondt R., Slaets P., Cassiman B. The degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective R&D. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1992) 10:35–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1504–1513Link, Google Scholar
• DiMasi J. A. New drug innovation and pharmaceutical industry structure: Trends in the output of pharmaceutical firms. Drug Inform. J. (2000) 34:1169–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fink C., Fink C., Maskus K. E. Intellectual property rights and U.S. and German international transactions in manufacturing industries. Intellectual Property and Development. Lessons from Recent Economic Research (2005) (World Bank and Oxford University Press, New York) 75–110Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A. The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of licensing. (2004a) . Working paper 04-15, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
• Fosfuri A. Determinants of international activity: Evidence from the chemical processing industry. Res. Policy (2004b) 33:1599–1614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallant R. A.Nonlinear Statistical Models (1987) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J., Hsu D., Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33:571–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grindley P., Teece D. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Rev. (1997) 39:8–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H. Exploring the patent explosion. J. Tech. Transfer (2004) 30:35–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Ziedonis R. H. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32:101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:339–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L. Strategies for exploiting technological innovations: When and when not to license. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:428–441Link, Google Scholar
• Horstmann I., MacDonald J. M., Slivinski A. Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:837–858Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Marschke G. Accounting for the recent surge in U.S. patenting: Changes in R&D expenditures, patent yields, and the high-tech sector. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2004) 13:543–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux N. R., Sokoloff K. L., Lamoreaux N. R., Raff D. M., Temin P. Inventors, firms, and the market for technology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Learning by Doing in Firms, Markets, and Nations (1998) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 1987:783–820Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Sci. (1986) 32:173–181Link, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontier in Econometrics (1973) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mowery D. The relationship between contractual and intra-firm forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explorations Econom. Hist. (1983) October):351–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagaoka S. Impact of intellectual property rights on international licensing: Evidence from licensing contracts of Japanese industry. (2002) . Unpublished manuscript, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
• Nelson R. R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. (1959) 67:297–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A., Roberts P. W. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:779–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner-Hahn J., Shaver M. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puttitanun T. Intellectual property rights and multinational firms’ modes of entry. (2003) . Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
• Rivette K. G., Kline D.Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T., Hill C. W. L. Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):52–70Link, Google Scholar
• Schankerman M., Pakes A. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. Econom. J. (1986) 96:1052–1076Google Scholar
• Scherer F. M., Harhoff D. Technology policy for a world of skew distributed outcomes. Res. Policy (2000) 29:559–566Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49:3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S. Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1173–1190Link, Google Scholar
• Smith P. J. How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? J. Internat. Econom. (2001) 55:411–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. (1977) 87:242–261Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Competition, cooperation and innovation. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1992) 18:1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Kuemmerle W. Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: Evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:619–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Teece D. J. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Balling Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar
• Yang G., Maskus K., Fink C., Maskus K. E. Intellectual property rights and licensing: An econometric investigation. Intellectual Property and Development. Lessons from Recent Economic Research (2005) (World Bank and Oxford University Press, New York) 111–134Google Scholar
• Zhao Z., Anand W., Mitchell J. A dual networks perspective on inter-organizational transfer of R&D capabilities: International joint ventures in the Chinese automotive industry. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42:127–160Crossref, Google Scholar