Research Note—Sell First, Fix Later: Impact of Patching on Software Quality

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0440

References

  • Banker R., Slaughter S. A field study of scale economies in software maintenance. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1709–1725LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baskerville R., Levine L., Pries-Heje J., Ramesh B., Slaughter S. How Internet software companies negotiate quality. IEEE Comput. (2001) 34(5):51–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bessen James. Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods. (2002) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks F. R.The Mythical Man Month (1995) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Teck-Hua Ho. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):173–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson W. L., Worrell D. L. The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(6):467–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A. Metrics for measuring product development cycle times. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(2):112–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):422–436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poor software quality: Time to do something about itInformation Week (2002) . (May 20) www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
  • Get ready to patchInformation Week (2004) . (August 30) www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
  • Microsoft: No patch before its timeInformation Week (2005) . (March 8) www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrell G., Peltzman S. The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(1):512–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan M. S., Kriebel C. H., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):745–759LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G., Yoon E. The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1990) 36(5):568–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • NIST Report The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. (2002) . National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Paulk M. C., Curtis B., Chrissis M. B., Weber C. V.The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process for Software (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Picker R. Cyber security: Of heterogeneity and autarky. (2004) . Olin working paper no. 223, University of Chicago Law and Economics, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Reddy B., Evans D. S. Government preferences for promoting open-source software: A solution in search of a problem. (2002) . Working paper, http://ssrn.com Google Scholar
  • Zirger B., Maidique M. A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1990) 36(7):867–883LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.