Proactive and Reactive Product Line Strategies: Asymmetries Between Market Leaders and Followers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0443

References

  • Bayus B. L., Putsis W. Product proliferation: An empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18:137–153LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman D., Gatignon H. Determinants of competitor response time. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:42–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Business Marketing Sun’s war against Microsoft escalates. (1999) October):1Google Scholar
  • BusinessWeek Can HP’s printer biz keep printing money? (2003) July 14):68–70Google Scholar
  • Carpenter G. S. Modeling competitive marketing strategies: The impact of marketing mix relationships and industry structure. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6:208–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:100–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M., MacMillan I. C. Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:539–560CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M., Miller D. Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:85–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M., Smith K., Grimm C. Action characteristics as predictors of competitive response. Management Sci. (1992) 28:439–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chow G. C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica (1960) 28:591–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Computer Reseller News Lotus reduces smartsuite prices to boost market share. (1996) April 15):6Google Scholar
  • Dekimpe M., Hanssens D. M. Sustained spending and persistent response: A new look at long-term marketing profitability. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36:397–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draganska M., Jain D. Product line length as a competitive tool. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 14:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer B., Michael Song X. Innovation strategy and sanctioned conflict: A new edge in innovation? J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:505–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frances P. H. On the use of econometric models for policy simulation in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42:4–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Reibstein D. J., Day G. S., Reibstein D. J. Creative strategies for responding to competitive actions. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 237–255Google Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Anderson E., Helsen K. Competitive reactions to market entry: Explaining interfirm differences. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26:44–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Robertson T., Fein A. Incumbent defense strategies against innovative entry. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1997) 14:163–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Weitz B., Bansal P. Brand introduction strategies and competitive environments. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27:390–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glesjer H. A new test for heteroscedasticity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1969) 64:316–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gresov C., Haveman H. A., Oliva T. A. Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:181–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanssens D. M. Market response, competitive behavior, and time series analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17:470–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heil O., Helsen K. Toward an understanding of price wars: Their nature and how they erupt. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18:83–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kadiyali V., Vilcassim N., Chintagunta P. K. Product line extensions and competitive market interactions: An empirical analysis. J. Econometrics (1999) 89:339–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Broader product line: A necessity to achieve market success. Management Sci. (1990) 36:1216–1231LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan T., Bass F., Kumar V. Impact of a late entrant on the diffusion of a new product/service. J. Market Res. (2000) 37:269–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K. The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9:189–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang P., Wittink D. Explaining competitive reaction effects. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18:119–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muth J. F. Rational expectations and the theory of price movement. Econometrica (1961) 29:315–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narisetti R. P&G seeing shoppers were being confused, overhauls marketing. The Wall Street Journal (1997) January 15):A1Google Scholar
  • Nerlove M. Adaptive expectations and cobweb phenomena. Quart. J. Econom. (1958) 72:227–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Putsis W. P., Bayus B. L. An empirical analysis of firms’ product line decisions. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:110–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramaswamy V., Gatignon H., Reibstein D. J. Competitive marketing behavior in industrial markets. J. Marketing (1994) 58:45–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T. Commentary: Marketing applications of economics of product variety. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9:207–211LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roy A., Hanssens D. M., Raju J. S. Competitive pricing by a price leader. Management Sci. (1994) 40:809–823LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar V. Pioneers’ marketing mix reaction to entry in different competitive game structures: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:271–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar V. New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: Their inter-relationship and the role of multimarket contact. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36:327–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shomberg A. J., Grimm C. M., Smith K. G. Avoiding new product warfare: The role of industry structure. Adv. Strategic Management (1994) 10B:145–173Google Scholar
  • Smith K., Grimm C. M., Wally S. Strategic groups and rivalrous firm behavior: Toward a reconciliation. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:149–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith K., Grimm C. M., Gannon M., Chen M. Organizational information processing, competitive responses. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:60–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Souder W. E., Song X. M., Kawamura K. America’s edge in new product R&D. Res. Tech. Management (1998) 41:49–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the U.S. auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20:42–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Heerde, Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Semiparametric analysis to estimate the deal effect curve. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:197–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataraman S., Chen M., MacMillan I. C., Day G. S., Reibstein D. J. Anticipating reactions: Factors that shape competitor responses. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 198–219Google Scholar
  • Wall Street Journal, The (1997) . Intel price cuts on top chips are moderate—Robust demand leaves industry front-runner unafraid of competitors. (January 20) B2Google Scholar
  • Wall Street Journal, The (1999) . Lexmark to launch six laser printers in a bid to grab market share from H-P. (September 21) B5Google Scholar
  • Winer R. A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13:250–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.