Testing the Statistical Significance of Linear Programming Estimators

References

• Banker R. Hypothesis tests using data envelopment analysis. J. Productivity Anal. (1996) 7:139–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Charnes A., Cooper W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Sci. (1984) 30:1078–1092Link, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W., Rhodes E. Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2:429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W., Sueyoshi T. A goal programming/constrained regression review of the Bell System breakup. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1–26Link, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibshirani R.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman & Hall, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans D., Heckman J. Natural monopoly and the Bell System: Response to Charnes, Cooper and Sueyoshi. Management Sci. (1988) 34:27–38Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfeld S., Quandt R.Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics (1972) (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Hauser J., Shugan S. Intensity measures of consumer preference. Oper. Res. (1980) 28:278–320Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. Evaluation of salesforce size and productivity through efficient frontier benchmarking. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15:301–320Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Rao M. Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Management Sci. (1984) 30:801–822Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P., Posavac S. Stating preference for the Ethereal but choosing the concrete: How the tangibility of attributes affects attribute weighting in value elicitation and choice. J. Consumer Psych. (2004) 14:132–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain A., Acito F., Malhotra N., Mahajan V. A comparison of the internal validity of alternative parameter estimation methods in decompositional multiattribute preference models. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:313–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamakura W., Srivastava R. An ideal-point probabilistic choice model for heterogeneous preferences. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5:199–219Link, Google Scholar
• Klahr D. A Monte-Carlo investigation of the statistical significance of Kruskal's nonmetric scaling procedure. Psychometrika (1969) 34:319–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seiford L., Thrall R. Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J. Econometrics (1990) 46:7–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L., Wilson P. Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. J. Productivity Anal. (2000) 13:49–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Shocker A. Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika (1973) 38:337–369Crossref, Google Scholar