Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-offs with Binary Attributes

References

• Baucells M., Carrasco J. A., Hogarth R. M. Cumulative dominance and heuristic performance in binary multiattribute choice. (2005) . DEE working paper 895, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
• Bröder A. Assessing the empirical validity of the take-the-best heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition (2000) 26(5):1332–1346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bröder A. Decision making with the “adaptive toolbox”: Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition (2003) 29(4):611–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bröder A., Schiffer S. Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (2003) 132(2):277–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E.Conceptual Framework of Psychology (1952) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Chater N., Oaksford M., Nakisa R., Redington M. Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2003) 90:63–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R. M., Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psych. Bull. (1974) 81:95–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1975) 13:171–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. (1978) 85:395–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fasolo B., McClelland G. H., Todd P. M. Escaping the tyranny of choice: When fewer attributes make choice easier. Marketing TheoryIn pressGoogle Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103:650–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M.the ABC Research Group. the ABC Research GroupSimple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M.Judgement and Choice (1987) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Fiedler K., Juslin P. Is confidence in decisions related to feedback? Evidence—and lack of evidence—from random samples of real-world behavior. In the Beginning There is a Sample: Information Sampling as a Key to Understand Adaptive Cognition(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) . In pressGoogle Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N.“Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When They Work “Well” in Binary Choice (2003) . DEE Working Paper 709, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Karelaia N. Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less “more”? J. Math. Psych. (2005) 49:115–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Rottenstreich Y. Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (2004) 133(1):23–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414Link, Google Scholar
• Katsikopoulos K., Martignon L. Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy. J. Math. Psych.In pressGoogle Scholar
• Katsikopoulos K., Fasolo B. New tools for decision analysts. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics: Systems HumansIn pressGoogle Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce M. F., Bettman J. R., Payne J. W. Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition. (1997) 23(2):384–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martignon L., Hoffrage U., Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M.the ABC Research Group. the ABC Research Group Why does one-reason decision making work? A case study in ecological rationality. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) 119–140Google Scholar
• Martignon L., Hoffrage U. Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory Decision (2002) 52:29–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery H., Humphreys P., Svenson O., Vari A. Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. Analysing and Aiding Decision Processes (1983) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 343–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell B. R., Shanks D. R. Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing “one-reason” decision making. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory, Cognition (2003) 29(1):53–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell B. R., Weston N. J., Shanks D. R. Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone “takes-the-best.”. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2003) 91:82–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J. Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:87–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rakow T., Hinvest N., Jackson E., Palmer M. Simple heuristics from the adaptive toolbox: Can we perform the requisite learning? Thinking Reasoning (2004) 10(1):1–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rieskamp J., Hoffrage U., Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M.the ABC Research Group. the ABC Research Group When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell? Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) 141–167Google Scholar
• Rieskamp J., Hoffrage U. The use of simple heuristics: Inferences and preferences under time pressure. (2002) . Working paper, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Shanteau J., Thomas P. P. Fast and frugal heuristics: What about unfriendly environments? Behavioral Brain Sci. (2000) 23:762–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:129–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorngate W. Efficient decision heuristics. Behavioral Sci. (1980) 25:219–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79:281–299Crossref, Google Scholar