Environmental Volatility, Development Decisions, and Software Volatility: A Longitudinal Analysis

References

• Abrahamson E. Managing change in a world of excessive change. Ivey Bus. J. Online (2004) January/February). www.iveybusinessjournal.comGoogle Scholar
• Al-Janabi A., Aspinwall E. An evaluation of software design using the Demeter tool. Software Engrg. J. (1993) 8(6):319–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Anand G., Ward P. Fit, flexibility and performance in manufacturing: Coping with dynamic environments. Production Oper. Management (2004) 13(4):369–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D., Goodman P., Lawrence B., Tushman M. Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(4):645–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi B.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2001) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Baltagi B., Chang Y. Simultaneous equations with incomplete panels. Econometric Theory (2000) 16:269–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Slaughter S. A field study of scale economies in software maintenance. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1709–1725Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Slaughter S. The moderating effects of software structure on volatility and complexity in software enhancement. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(3):219–240Link, Google Scholar
• Barry E. Software evolution, volatility, and life cycle maintenance patterns. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Bennett K. Software evolution: Past, present and future. Inform. Software Tech. (1996) 39(11):673–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breusch T., Godfrey L., Currie D., Nobay R., Peel D. A review of recent work on testing for autocorrelation in dynamic simultaneous models. Macroeconomic Analysis: Essays in Macroeconomics and Econometrics (1981) (Croon Helm, London) 63–105Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K., Wheelwright S.Managing Product and Process Development (1998) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Dess G., Beard D. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(1):52–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugal M., Gopalakrishnan S. Environmental volatility: A reassessment of the construct. Internat. J. Organ. Anal. (2000) 8(4):401–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta A. Telecommunications and economic activity: An analysis of Granger causality. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 17(4):71–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finlay P., Mitchell A. Perceptions of the benefits from introduction of CASE: An empirical study. MIS Quart. (1994) 18:353–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Georgiadou E. Software process and product improvement: A historical perspective. Cybernetics Systems Anal. (2003) 39(1):125–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerwin D. Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Sci. (1993) 39(4):395–410Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman P., Shah S., Worchel S., Wood W., Simpson J. Familiarity and work group outcomes. Group Processes and Productivity (1992) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 578–586Google Scholar
• Granger C. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica (1969) 37:424–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) 6th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1984) 49:149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D., Mohamed S., McGrath J., Florey A., Vanderstoep S. Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psych. (2003) 56(3):633–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• IEEEIEEE Standard #1016 for Software Design (1998) (IEEE, New York) Google Scholar
• Kelley M. Productivity and technology: The elusive connection. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1406–1426Link, Google Scholar
• Kemerer C. Software complexity and software maintenance: A survey of empirical research. Ann. Software Engrg. (1995) 1:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemerer C., Slaughter S. Determinants of software maintenance profiles: An empirical investigation. Software Maintenance: Res. Practice (1997) 9:235–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemerer C., Slaughter S. An empirical approach to studying software evolution. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1999) 25(4):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1998) 4th ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Koopman P. Embedded system design issues. Proc. Internat. Conf. Comput. Design (1996) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Austin, TX) 310–317Google Scholar
• Krajewski L., Ritzman L.Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis (2002) 6th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman M. M., Ramil J. F., Wernick P. D., Perry D. E., Turski W. M. Metrics and laws of software evolution. Fourth Internat. Software Metrics Sympos. (1997) (Albuquerque, NM). Metrics ’97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Limayem M., Khalifa M., Chin W. CASE tools usage and impact on system development performance. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2004) 14:153–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):133–150Link, Google Scholar
• McMurtrey M., Teng J., Grover V., Kher H. Current utilization of CASE technology: Lessons from the field. Indust. Management Data Systems (2000) 100(1):22–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamara G., Vaaler P., Deevers C. Same as it ever was: The search for evidence of increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(3):261–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Pillai R. Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. (1999) 1(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Liner Statistical Models Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design (1990) 3rd ed.(Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL) Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S., Knotts G. Effects of customizability and reusability on perceived process and competitive performance of software firms. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(2):105–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parthasarthy R., Sethi S. P. The impact of flexible automation on business strategy and organizational structure. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):86–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Krishnan M. The new meaning of quality in the information age. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):109–118Google Scholar
• Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacks M.On the Job Learning in the Software Industry: Corporate Culture and the Acquisition of Knowledge (1994) (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sastry M. A. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):237–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhar A. One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):394–414Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Reinertsen D. Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Rev. (1998) 41(1):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitten J., Bentley L., Dittman K.Systems Analysis and Design Methods (2004) 6th ed.(McGrawHill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar