In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition

References

• Acs Z., Audretsch D. Innovation, market structure and firm size. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1987) 71:567–574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. Organizational structure, information technology and R&D productivity. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1986) 33:212–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J. Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2001) 19(1):2–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A. Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions. Econom. Lett. (1996) 50:51–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Gambardella A. Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38:361–379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A., Gambardella A. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1994) 24(1):91–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. (1998) . Working paper 6600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Cockburn I., Henderson R. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46:157–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I., Henderson R., Stern S. Balancing incentives: The tension between basic and applied research. (2000) . Working paper 6882, National Bureau of Economic Research, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Cohen W., Levin R., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organisation (1989) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1060–1107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
• Cr\'epon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1998) 7(2):115–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debackere K., Fleurent I. De CIS-enquete voor Vlaanderen: een non-response analyse. (1995) . Working paper, Vlerick Management School, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
• Freeman C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Res. Policy (1991) 20(5):499–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouri\'eroux C., Montfort A., Renault E., Trognon A. Generalized residuals. J. Econometrics (1987) 35:143–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granstrand O., Bohlin E., Oskarsson C., Sjöberg N. External technology acquisition in large multitechnology corporations. R&D Management (1992) 22:111–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87:291–213Google Scholar
• Maddala G.Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:511–528Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19:179–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miravete E., Pernias J. Innovation complementarity and scale of production. J. Indust. Econom. (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. (2003) . Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Pisano G. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:153–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M., Siggelkow N. Contextuality within activity systems. Acad. Management Proc. BPS (2000) F1–F5Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rigby D., Zook C. Open-market innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(10):80–89Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy (1990) 19:165–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothwell R., Freeman C., Horsley A., Jervis V. T. P., Robertson A. B., Townsend J. Sappho updated: Project Sappho: Phase II. Res. Policy (1974) 3(3):258–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1943) (Allen and Unwin, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veugelers R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Res. Policy (1997) 26(3):303–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veugelers R., Cassiman B. Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Res. Policy (1999) 28:63–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar