Overoptimism and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms

References

• Arabsheibani G., de Meza D., Maloney J., Pearson B. And a vision appeared unto them of a great profit: Evidence of self-deception among the self-employed. Econom. Lett. (2000) 67:35–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A. Licensing tacit knowledge: Intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Econom. New Tech. Innovation (1995) 4:41–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A. Contracting for tacit knowledge: The provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts. J. Development Econom. (1996) 50(2):233–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T. The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving? Econom. J. (2003) 113:226–239Google Scholar
• AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2002 (2003) (Association of University Technology Managers, Northbrook, IL) Google Scholar
• Babcock L., Lowenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econom. Perspect. (1997) 11(1):109–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L., Wang X., Loewenstein G. Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econom. (1996) CXI(1):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B., Odean T. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):261–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J., deFigueiredo J. M., Teece D. J., Garud R., Nayyar P. R., Shapira Z. B. Firm capabilities and managerial decision making: A theory of innovation biases. Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights (1997) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 233–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blossfeld H.-P., Rohwer G.Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Busenitz L. W., Barney J. B. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing (1997) 12:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Weber R. The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: A re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1999) 39:59–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):306–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper A. C., Woo C. Y., Dunkelberg W. C. Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing (1988) 3(2):97–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bondt W. F. M., Thaler R. H. Do security analysts overreact? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(2):52–57Google Scholar
• Dechenaux E., Goldfarb B., Shane S. A., Thursby M. C. Appropriability and the timing of innovation: Evidence from MIT inventions. (2003) . Working paper W9735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• de Meza D., Southey C. The borrower’s curse: Optimism finance and entrepreneurship. Econom. J. (1996) 106:375–386Google Scholar
• Elfenbein D. Contract structure and performance of technology transfer agreements: Evidence from university licenses. (2004) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Etzkowitz H.MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science (2002) (Routledge, New York)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. P., Feller I., Bercovitz J. E. L., Burton R. M. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Sci. (2002) 48:105–121Link, Google Scholar
• Gans J. S., Stern S. When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit? Evidence from the SBIR program. (2000) . Working paper W7877, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Gans J. S., Hsu D. H., Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(4):571–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Ahlstrom D. Technology assessment: A socio-cognitive perspective. J. Engrg. Tech. Managment (1997) 14:25–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward M. L. A., Hambrick D. C. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence from ceo hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):103–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R., Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(1):240–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 37(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan E. L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1958) 53:457–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landier A., Thesmar D. Financial contracting with optimistic entrepreneurs: Theory and evidence. (2003) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M. Stylized facts of patent litigation: Value, scope, and ownership. (1997) . Working paper w6297, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lerner J. The government as venture capitalist: The long-run effects of the SBIR program. J. Bus. (1999) 72:285–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe R. A., Libecap G. The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing university inventions. Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes (2001) (JAI Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 189–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe R. A. Invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship: The commercialization of university research by inventor-founded firms. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lowe R. A. Who develops a university invention? The impact of tacit knowledge and licensing policies. J. Tech. Transfer (2006) 31(4). ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U., Tate G. Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. (2004) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Malmendier U., Tate G. CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J. Finance (2005) 60(6):2661–2700Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy A. M., Schoorman F. D., Cooper A. C. Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment? J. Bus. Venturing (1993) 8:9–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R., Sampat B. N., Ziedonis A. A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Res. Policy (2001) 20:99–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. (1959) 67(3):297–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance (1998) 53(5):1775–1798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roll R. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. J. Bus. (1986) 59(2):197–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat B. N., Ziedonis A. A., Moed H. F., Glãnzel W., Schmoch U. Patent citations and the economic value of patents. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2004) (Springer, New York) 277–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy D. K., Simon H., Lave L. Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1998) 33:207–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S. Selling university technology. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):122–137Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S. Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. J. Bus. Venturing (2004) 19:127–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S., Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):154–170Link, Google Scholar
• Simon M., Houghton S. M. The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(2):139–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L.Social Structure and Organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Suen W. The self-perpetuation of biased beliefs. Econom. J. (2004) 114:377–396Google Scholar
• Tarone R. E., Ware J. H. On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika (1977) 64:156–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. A., Jaffe A. B. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. New Tech. Innovation (1997) 5:19–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• UC Technology Transfer Annual Report 2000 (2001) (University of California, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar
• Wason P. C. Reasoning about a rule. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. (1968) 20:273–281Crossref, Google Scholar