The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know?

References

• Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(3):420–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily W., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582Link, Google Scholar
• Austin J. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy in group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):866–878Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Social Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. Group stability: A socio-cognitive approach. Adv. Group Processes (1990) 7:1–44Google Scholar
• Carley K. M. Validating computational models. (1996) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Carley K. M. Simulating society: The tension between transparency and veridicality. Agent 2002 Conf. (2002) Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Carley K. M., Prietula M. J., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. Computational organization theory. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) xi–xviiGoogle Scholar
• Carley K. M., Ren Y., Krackhardt D. Measuring and modeling change in C3I architectures. Internat. Sympos. Command Control Res. Tech. (2000) Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P., Cohen M. D., Sproull L. S. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organizational Learning (1996) Vol. 18(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 403–429Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker K. S., Prietula M. J., Carley K. M., Gasser L. Task environment centered simulation. Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institution and Groups (1998) Vol. 6(AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(3):313–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. (1996) 17(Special Issue):109–122Google Scholar
• Hatcher L., Stepanski E. J.A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics (1994) Vol. 6(SAS Publishing, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
• Henry R. A. Improving group judgment accuracy: Information sharing and determining the best member. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1995) 62(2):190–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Sego D. J., Hedlund J., Mafor D. A., Philips J. Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80:292–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. J. Experiment. Social Psych. (1998) 34:423–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulin C., Ilgen D. R., Ilgen D. R., Hulin C. L. Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. Computational Modeling of Behavior in Organizations (2000) Vol. 1(American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 3–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Carley K. M. PCANS model of structure in organizations. 1998 Internat. Sympos. Command Control Res. Tech. (1998) Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
• Krauss R. M., Fussell S. R., Galegher J., Kraut R. E., Egido C. Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Bases of Collaborative Work (1990) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kraut R., Slaughter S., Espinosa A. A challenge to group research: Using group theory to social engineering. 2004 Acad. Management Meeting (2004) New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
• Kunz J. C., Levitt R. E., Jin Y. The virtual design team: A computational simulation model of project organizations. Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (1998) 41(11):84–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):587–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(4):384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. A theoretical evaluation of measures of organizational design: Interrelationship and performance predictability. Computational Organization Theory (1994) Vol. 6(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 113–160Google Scholar
• Littlepage G. E., Robison W., Reddington K. Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1997) 69:133–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell A., Simon H. A.Human Problem Solving (1972) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ren Y. Simulating the role of transactive memory in group performance. 4th Internat. Organ. Learn. Knowledge Management Conf. (2001) London, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• So Y., Durfee E. H., Prietula M. J., Carley K. M., Gasser L. Designing organizations for computational agents. Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institution and Groups (1998) Vol. 3(AAAI Press, Cambridge, MA) 47–66Google Scholar
• Steiner I. D.Group Process and Productivity (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Stewart T. A. Mapping corporate brainpower. Fortune (1995) October 30):209–212Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1987) Vol. 9(Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Social Psych. (1991) 61(6):923–929Crossref, Google Scholar