Optimal Mechanisms with Finite Agent Types

References

• Ausubel L., Cramton P. The optimality of being efficient. (1999) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Cheng H. Optimal auction design with discrete bidding. (2004) . Discussion Paper 036, Interfaces for Advanced Economic Analysis, Kyoto University, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
• Dasgupta P., Hammond P., Maskin E. The implementation of social choice rules: Some general results on incentive compatibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1979) 46(2):185–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S. Competition for procurement contracts and underinvestment. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1990) 31:841–865Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (2002) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Harris M., Raviv A. Allocation mechanisms and the design of auctions. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1477–1499Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M., Kriebel C., Raviv A. Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation. Management Sci. (1982) 28(6):604–620Link, Google Scholar
• Hart O. Optimal labour contracts under asymmetric information: An introduction. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1983) 50(1):3–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X., Malakhov A., Vohra R. A primer on optimal auctions. (2003) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Li Y. Hospital capacity investment: Theory and practice. (2005) . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15(2):171–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melumad N., Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. A theory of responsibility centers. J. Accounting Econom. (1992) 15:445–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melumad N., Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. Contract complexity, incentive, and the value of delegation. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(2):257–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 56:378–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore J. Contracting between two parties with private information. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1988) LV:49–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):61–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Piccione M., Tan G. Cost-reducing investment, optimal procurement and implementation by auctions. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1996) 37:663–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole L. Lectures on the theory of contracts and organizations. (2001) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Talluri K., van Ryzin G.The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan G. Entry and R&D in procurement contracting. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 58:41–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis D. Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(2):305–321Link, Google Scholar
• Vaysman I. A model of cost-based transfer pricing. Rev. Accounting Stud. (1996) 1:73–108Crossref, Google Scholar