Note on Self-Restraint as an Online Entry-Deterrence Strategy
Published Online:1 Nov 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0566
References
- . Circuit city 1st major CE chain to embrace click and mortar. Twice (2000) Feb. 21):25Google Scholar
- Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17:181–195Link, Google Scholar
- Does the Internet make markets more competitive? Evidence from the life insurance industry. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110:481–507Crossref, Google Scholar
- Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. (2000) 49(11):1580–1596Link, Google Scholar
- Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1580–1596Link, Google Scholar
- Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(31):488–511Google Scholar
- . From retailing to e-tailing. The McKinsey Quart. (2000) 1:140–147Google Scholar
- Integrating multiple channelsChain Store Age (2001) August):24A–25AGoogle Scholar
- Prices and price dispersion on the Web: Evidence from the online book industry. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):521–539Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competitor see, competitor do: Incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):55–66Link, Google Scholar
- Menu costs, posted prices, and multiproduct retailers. J. Money, Credit, and Banking (1999) 31(4):683–703Crossref, Google Scholar
- The state of retailing online 7.0Forrester Research (2004) May):1–25Google Scholar
- Product line rivalry with brand differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) XLI:223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
- Credible spatial preemption through franchising. RAND J. Econom. (1991) 22(4):531–543Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
- Credible spatial preemption. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(2):153–166Crossref, Google Scholar
- When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Sci. (1999) 18:485–503Link, Google Scholar
- The magnitude of menu costs: Direct evidence from large U.S. supermarket chains. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(3):791–825Crossref, Google Scholar
- The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):97–105Link, Google Scholar
- Gap.com best brick-and-mortar brand online. Adweek (Eastern Edition) (2000) 41(23):IQ56–IQ58Google Scholar
- Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):342–358Link, Google Scholar
- Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9:305–327Crossref, Google Scholar
- E-commerce (a special report): The view from above-sibling rivalry: For traditional retailers to succeed on the Web, they have to deal with a big obstacle—themselvesThe Wall Street Journal (2000) July 17):R16Google Scholar
- E-commerce (a special report): When worlds collide: E-tailers are groping for a way to integrate their online and offline stores; it isn’t easyThe Wall Street Journal (2003) April 28):R1Google Scholar
- On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1Google Scholar
- Expanding to the Internet: Pricing and communications strategies when firms compete on multiple channels. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37:292–308Crossref, Google Scholar

