Strategic Commitments for an Optimal Capacity Decision Under Asymmetric Forecast Information

References

• Arrow K. J., Pratt J. P., Zeckhauser R. J. The economics of agency. Principals and Agents (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Aviv Y. A time series framework for supply chain inventory management. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):210–227Link, Google Scholar
• Barnes-Schuster D., Bassok Y., Anupindi R. Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2002) 4:171–207Link, Google Scholar
• Brown A., Lee H. Optimal “pay to delay” capacity reservation with application to the semiconductor industry. (1998) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Cachon G., de Kok A. G., Graves S. C. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2001) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 229–332Chapter 6Google Scholar
• Cachon G. The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. (2004) 50:222–238Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G., Lariviere M. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47:629–646Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F., de Kok A. G., Graves S. C. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2001) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 341–413Chapter 7Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Ho T., Ren J. Z., Terwiesch C. Measuring imputed costs in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1653–1670Link, Google Scholar
• Cole J. Boeing, pushing for record production, finds part shortages, delivery delays. Wall Street Journal (1997) June 26Google Scholar
• Corbett C., de Groote X. A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Sci. (2000) 46:444–450Link, Google Scholar
• Engardio P. Why the supply chain broke down. BusinessWeek (2001) March 19Google Scholar
• Erhun F., Keskinocak P., Tayur S. Sequential procurement in a capacitated supply chain facing uncertain demand. (2003) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Erkoc M., Wu D. Managing high-tech capacity expansion via reservation contracts. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(2):232–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Files J. Economic downturn leaves Cisco with stacks of excess inventory. San Jose Mercury News (2001) April 27Google Scholar
• Fisher M., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:87–99Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gibbons R.Game Theory for Applied Economists (1992) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ha A. Supplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Res. Logist. (2001) 48:41–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanstrom A., Lundberg C., Sahlin M. Personal communication with Ericsson managers as part of a three-year Stanford-Ericsson project. (2002) Google Scholar
• Iyer A., Bergen M. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43:559–570Link, Google Scholar
• Kaya M., Ö. Özer. Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractible product quality and private quality cost information. (2003) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lau A., Lau H. Some two-echelon style goods inventory models with asymmetric market information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 134:29–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H., Padmanadbhan P., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43:546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Mailath G. Incentive compatibility in signaling games with a continuum of types. Econometrica (1987) 55:1349–1365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö. Replenishment strategies for distribution systems under advance demand information. Management Sci. (2003) 49:255–272Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö., Uncu O., Wei W. Selling to the “newsvendor” with a forecast update: Analysis of a dual purchase contract. (2003) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Pasternack B. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Porteus E., Whang S. Supply chain contracting: Non-recurring engineering charge, minimum order quantity and boilerplate contracts. (1999) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Spengler J. Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58:347–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang C. S., Kumar R., Alptekinoglu A., Ou J. The benefits of advance booking discount programs: Model and analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50:465–478Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor T., Plambeck E. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. (2003) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Toktay L. B., Wein L. M. Analysis of a forecasting-production-inventory system with stationary demand. Management Sci. (2001) 47(9):1268–1281Link, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. Capacity investment in supply chains: Sharing the gain rather than sharing the pain. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(4):317–333Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay A. The quantity flexibility contract and supply-customer incentive. Management Sci. (1999) 45:1339–1358Link, Google Scholar