Time Value of Commercial Product Returns
Published Online:1 Aug 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0522
References
- Turning returns into cash. Transportation Distribution (2002) 43(8):29–39Google Scholar
- Time-Based Competition: The Next Battleground in American Manufacturing (1991) (Business One Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
- Limits of time-based competition: Strategic sourcing decisions in make-to-stock manufacturing. (2001) . Working Paper 01-19, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
- Reverse supply chains for commercial returns. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(2):6–22Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal return policy for supply chain with e-marketplace. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2004) 88:205–227Crossref, Google Scholar
- Personal communication with world wide product returns manager. (2001) December(Inkjet Products Group, Hewlett-Packard Company, Vancouver, WA) Google Scholar
- Money-back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing (1995) 71:7–22Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(1):116–121Google Scholar
- Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (1998) (Perseus Books, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
- What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(2):83–93Google Scholar
- Quantitative models for reverse logistics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2001) Vol. 501(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) Google Scholar
- Fundamentals of Queuing Theory (1998) (Wiley Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
- Production planning and control for remanufacturing. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18:467–483Crossref, Google Scholar
- Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10:142–155Crossref, Google Scholar
- Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N.Business Aspects of Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2003) (Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
- Matching supply and demand to maximize profits in remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5:303–316Link, Google Scholar
- Personal communication with solution and services manager. (2002) September(Equipment Management and Remarketing, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Herrenberg, Germany) Google Scholar
- The logistics impact of a mixture of order streams in a manufacturer-retailer system. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):890–906Link, Google Scholar
- Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):40–53Link, Google Scholar
- Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):633–640Link, Google Scholar
- Industry clockspeed: Measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (1999) 1:1–20Link, Google Scholar
- Returns policies: Make money by making good. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) 37(1):65–72Google Scholar
- Manufacturer’s returns policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 17:81–94Link, Google Scholar
- Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:166–176Link, Google Scholar
- Many happy (product) returns. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(7):16–17Google Scholar
- Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1387–1406Link, Google Scholar
- Inventory management of remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1412–1426Link, Google Scholar
- Managing retail channel overstock: Markdown money and return policies. J. Retailing (2001) 77:457–492Crossref, Google Scholar
- Personal communication with director, product service. (2002) June(Robert Bosch Tool Corporation, Addison, IL) Google Scholar
- How sustainable is your competitive advantage? California Management Rev. (1992) 34(3):29–51Crossref, Google Scholar
- Personal communication with reconditioned tool business manager. (2003) June(Robert Bosch Tool Corporation, Addison, IL) Google Scholar
- Remote purchase environments: The influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:157–169Crossref, Google Scholar

