Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530

References

  • Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80:123–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvesson M.Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Murninghan J. K. The classic and the contemporary: A new blend of small group theory. Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research (1993) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 225–243Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ashforth B. E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:20–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16(6):1021–1046CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:29–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carlile P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23:239–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(4):737–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Zbaracki M. J. Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:17–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman S. P. Secrecy, information, and politics: An essay in organizational decision making. Human Relations (1988) 41:73–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Goodman P., Wilson J. Substitutes for socialization and exocentric teams. Res. Managing Groups Teams (2000) 3:53–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R. Acquiring and applying knowledge in transnational teams: The roles of cosmopolitans and locals. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(3):367–384LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–345Google Scholar
  • Hackman J. R.Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:232–248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Daft R., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L., Roberts K. H., Porter L. W. The information environments of organizations. Handbook of Organizational Communication (1987) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 130–164Google Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. J., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):245–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D. A., LaVoie L. Separating individual and group effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:339–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kozlowski S., Bell B., Borman W. C., Ilgen D. R., Klimoski R. J. Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2004) Vol. 12(Wiley, London, UK) 333–375Google Scholar
  • Langfred C. W. The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. J. Organ. Behavior (2000) 21:563–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. J. Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice-process theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57:327–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organizations and Environments: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Leonard D.Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long J. S.Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (1997) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Cooper L. P., Neece O. E. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. (2004) 50:174–189LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):370–386LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C. A. The intentional distortion of information in organizational communication: A laboratory and field investigation. Human Relations (1978) 31:173–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Patriotta G.Organizational Knowledge in the Making: How Firms Create, Use, and Institutionalize Knowledge (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Perlow L. The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:57–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M.The Politics of Organizational Decision Making (1973) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Sutton R.The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selznick P.TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (1949) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A., Lamberton D. M. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. The Economics of Communication and Information (1997) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 187–203Google Scholar
  • Spender J.-C., Grant R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:5–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:713–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Communication across organizational boundaries: Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:581–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:71–83LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E.The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Making Sense of the Organization (2001) (Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.