Discounting by Intervals: A Generalized Model of Intertemporal Choice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0534

References

  • Ahlbrecht M., Weber M. An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. (1997) 43:813–826LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. Can we use human judgments to determine the discount rate? Risk Anal. (2000) 20:861–868CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benzion U., Rapoport A., Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1989) 35:270–284LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brealey R. A., Myers S.The Principles of Corporate Finance (2002) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chapman G. B., Nelson R., Hier D. B. Familiarity and time preferences: Decision making about treatments for migraine headaches and Crohn's disease. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (1999) 5:17–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C., Rubinstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23:677–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T., Loewenstein G., Read D., Baumeister R. F. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Time and Decision (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 13–86Google Scholar
  • Green L., Fristoe N., Myerson J. Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1994) 1:383–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey C. M. Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1123–1139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holcomb J. H., Nelson P. S. Another experimental look at individual time preference. Rationality Soc. (1992) 4:199–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keren G., Roelofsma P. Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (1995) 63:287–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirby K. N., Herrnstein R. J. Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psych. Sci. (1995) 6:83–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopmans T. C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica (1960) 28:287–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 62:443–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K. An axiomatic theory of consumer time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1963) 4:221–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leland J. Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 9:151–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107:573–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur J. E., Commons M. L., Mazur J. E., Nevin L. A., Rachlin H. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (1987) 5(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–73Google Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rachlin H.Judgment, Decision, and Choice (1989) (Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
  • Read D. Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty (2001) 23:5–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Roelofsma P. H. M. P. Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process (2003) 91:140–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodriguez M. L., Logue A. W. Adjusting delay to reinforcement: Comparing choice in pigeons and humans. J. Experiment. Psych.: Animal Behav. Process (1988) 14:105–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roelofsma P. H. M. P., Read D. Intransitive intertemporal choice. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13:161–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1937) 4:155–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shelley M. K. Outcome signs, question frames, and discount rates. Management Sci. (1993) 37:770–786Google Scholar
  • Stevens S. S. On the psychophysical law. Psych. Rev. (1957) 64:153–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1955–1956) 23:165–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A. Intransitivity of preferences. Psych. Rev. (1969) 76:31–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Fox C. F. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102:269–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.