Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Prospect Theory
Published Online:1 Sep 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0537
References
- Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
- Measuring loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free approach. (2005a) . Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and GRID, ESTP and ENSAM-Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005b) 51(9):1348–1399Link, Google Scholar
- Reevaluation of the results of Levy and Levy (2002). Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 94(1):15–21Crossref, Google Scholar
- Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(1):75–92Crossref, Google Scholar
- Three new tests of independence that differentiate models of risky decision making. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1346–1358Link, Google Scholar
- Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 38(2):155–178Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Kagel J., Roth A. Individual decision making. Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 617–703Google Scholar
- The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):7–42Crossref, Google Scholar
- Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42(2):370–381Crossref, Google Scholar
- On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38(1):129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory, mental accounting and differences in aggregated and segregated evaluation of lottery portfolios. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):716–733Link, Google Scholar
- The influence of probability on risky choice—A parametric examination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 17:377–400Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):555–593Link, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: Much ado about nothing? Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1334–1349Link, Google Scholar
- Stochastic dominance and prospect dominance with subjective weighting functions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1998) 16(2):147–163Crossref, Google Scholar
- It is whether you win or lose: The importance of the overall probabilities of winning or losing in risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty (2005) 30:5–19Crossref, Google Scholar
- The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66(3):497–528Crossref, Google Scholar
- Generalized Expected Utility Theory/The Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Model (1993) (Kluwer-Nijhoff, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Increasing risk. I. A. definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:225–243Crossref, Google Scholar
- An experimental test of loss aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 25(3):233–249Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Way of Analysis (1995) (Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
- Advances in prospect theory—Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
- Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica (1995) 63(6):1255–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
- The data of Levy and Levy (2002), “Prospect theory: Much ado about nothing?” actually support prospect theory. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):979–981Link, Google Scholar
- An axiomization of cumulative prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 49(7):147–176Crossref, Google Scholar
- An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory. (2005) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- , Koehler D., Harvey N. Decision under risk. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 399–423Crossref, Google Scholar

