The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model?

References

• Aoki Masahiko, Takizawa Hirokazu. Incentives and option value in the Silicon-Valley tournament game. J. Comparative Econom. (2002) 30:759–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod Robert F.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Baldwin Carliss Y., Clark Kim B.Design Rules, Vol. 1. The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Yochai. Coase’s penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J. (2002) 112(3):369–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen James. Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods. (2002) . Retrieved June 7, 2005, http://www.researchoninnovation.org/opensrc.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Fehr Ernst, Falk Armin. Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2002) 46:697–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke Nikolaus, Shah Sonali. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):157–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh Rishab Aiyer. Cooking pot markets: An economic model for the free trade of goods and services on the Internet. First Monday (1998) 3(3). Retrieved May 22, 2003, http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue33/ghosh/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Godfrey Michael W., Tu Quiang. Evolution in open source software: A case study. ICSM 2000, Proc. Internat. Conf. Software Maintenance, San Jose, CA, October 11–14 (2000) IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA:131–142Google Scholar
• Harhoff Dietmar, Henkel Joachim, von Hippel Eric. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1753–1769Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel Joachim. The jukebox mode of innovation—A model of commercial open source development. (2004) . CEPR Discussion Paper 4507, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK. Retrieved September 27, 2005, http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP4507.aspGoogle Scholar
• Hienerth Christoph. The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Johnson Justin Pappas. Open source software: Private provision of a public good. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 2(4):637–662Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner Josh, Tirole Jean. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 52:197–234Google Scholar
• Lopes Cristina V., Bajracharya Sushil K. An analysis of modularity in aspect-oriented design. AOSD ’05: Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Aspect-Oriented Software Development, Chicago, IL, March 14–18 (2005) (ACM Press, New York) 15–26Google Scholar
• MacCormack Alan, Rusnak John, Baldwin Carliss. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1015–1030Link, Google Scholar
• Merton Robert C. Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. (1973) 4(Spring):141–183Reprinted 1990. Continuous Time Finance. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UKCrossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom Paul, Roberts John. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:511–528Google Scholar
• O’Mahony Siobhan. The emergence of a new commercial actor: Community managed software projects. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Management Science and Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Parnas David L., Hoffman D. M., Weiss D. M.Software Fundamentals: Collected Papers by David L. Parnas (2001) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Raymond Eric S.The Cathedral and the Bazaar (1999) (O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusnak John. The design structure analysis system: A tool to analyze software architecture. (2005) . Ph.D. dissertation, Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Shah Sonali. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1000–1014Link, Google Scholar
• Shaw Mary, Garlan David. Software Architecture: An Emerging Discipline (1996) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sullivan Kevin, Griswold William G., Cai Yuanfang, Hallen Ben. The structure and value of modularity in software design. SIGSOFT Software Engrg. Notes (2001) 26(5):99–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel Eric. Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel Eric, von Krogh Georg. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar