Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry

References

• Aghion P., Bolton P. Contracts as barriers to entry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(3):388–401Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99:116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B.Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avico U., Kaplan C., Korczak D., van Meter K. Cocaine epidemiology in three European Community cities: A pilot study using a snowball sampling methodology. (1988) . European Communities Health Directorate, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
• Berg S., Kotz S., Johnson N. L. Snowball sampling. Encyclopaedia of Statistical Science (1988) Vol. 8(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 529–532Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A., Jackman R. W., Fox J., Long J. S. Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Modern Methods of Data Analysis (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 257–291Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Why open source can succeed. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1243–1258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement. From community to business. Knowledge, Tech. Policy (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chatterjee S., Wernefelt B. The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and practise. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:33–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church J., Gandal N. Network effects, software provision and standardization. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):85–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L. Appropriation and appropriability in open source software. Internat. J. Innovation Management (2005) 9(3):259–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy (2005) 34(4):481–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle J. M., Julien N. Libre software: Turning fads into institutions? Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Everitt B. S.Cluster Analysis (1993) (Arnold and Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(1):70–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller J., Fitzgerald B.Understanding Open Source Software Development (2002) (Addison Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Frank O., Snijders T. Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. J. Official Statist. (1994) 10:53–67Google Scholar
• Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1199–1215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(1):160–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh R., Glott R., Krieger B., Robles G. Survey of developers. (2002) . Final Report, Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS): Survey and Study. International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Berlecon Research GmbH, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Greenstein S. M. Did installed base give an incumbent any (measurable) advantages in federal computer procurement? RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(1):19–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths P., Gossop M., Powis B., Strang J. Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: Methodological and practical issues. Addiction (1993) 88:1617–1626Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gustavson P., Koff W. Open source: Open for business. Leading Edge Forum 2004 Report (2004) . http://www.csc.com/features/2004/uploads/LEF_OPENSOURCE.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins R. E. The economics of the open source software for a competitive firm. Why give it away for free? Netnomics (2004) 6(2):103–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hecker F. Setting up shop: The business of open-source software. IEEE Software (1999) 16(1):45–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iannacci F. Coordination processes in open source software development: The Linux case study. Emergence: Complexity & Organ. (2005) 7:70–87Google Scholar
• Karshenas M., Stoneman P., Stoneman P. Technological diffusion. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (1995) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 298–341Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
• Klemperer P. The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18(1):138–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002a) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2002b) 21:20–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Y. Hybrid innovation: How does the collaboration between the FLOSS community and corporations happen? Knowledge, Technology, and Policy (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• McGowan D. Legal implications of open source software. U. Ill. L. Rev. (2001) 1:241–304Google Scholar
• Osterloh M., Rota S., von Wartburg M.Open Source—New Rules in Software Development (2002) . http://www.unizh.ch/ifbf/orga/downloads/opensourceaom.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Pisano G., Teece D., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollak M., Schlitz M. A. Does voluntary testing matter? How it influences homosexual safer sex. (1988) . Paper presented at The Fourth International Conference on AIDS, June 13, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
• Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (2001) (O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• Rossi C., Bonaccorsi A., Bitzer J., Schroeder P. J. H. Intrinsic motivations and profit-oriented firms in open source software. Do firms practise what they preach? The Economics of Open Source Software Development: Analyzing Motivation, Organization, Innovation and Competition in the Open Source Software Revolution (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Saunders P.Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation (1979) (Hutchinson, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Shy O.The Economics of the Network Industries (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. Estimation on the basis of snowball samples: How to weight. Bull. Methodol. Sociol. (1992) 36:59–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson S. K.Sampling (2002) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• van Meter K. M., Lambert E. Y. Methodological and design issues: Techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples. The Collection and Interpretation of Data From Hidden Populations (1990) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) 31–43Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• Wichmann T. Firms’ open source activities: Motivations and policy implications. (2002a) . Final Report, Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS): Survey and Study. International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Berlecon Research GmbH, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Wichmann T. Basics of open source software markets and business models. (2002b) . Final Report, Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS): Survey and Study. International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Berlecon Research GmbH, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Witt U. Lock-in vs. critical masses. Industrial changes under network externalities. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1997) 15(6):753–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar