Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows

References

• Anderson S. P., de Palma A., Thisse J.-F. Privatization and efficiency in a differentiated industry. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1997) 41:1635–1654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J. Optimal capital policy, the cost of capital and myopic decision rules. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. Tokyo (1964) 16:21–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessen J. Open source software: Free provision of a complex public good. (2002) . Working paper, Boston University School of Law, Harpswell, ME, http://opensource.mit.edu/online_papers.phpGoogle Scholar
• Bitzer J. Erosion of monopoly power due to the emergence of Linux. Econom. Systems (2004) 28(4):369–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer H., Marchand M., Thisse J.-F. Mixed oligopoly with differentiated products. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1991) 9:43–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle J.-M., Jullien N. “Libre” software: Turning fads into institutions? Res. Policy (2002) 32(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P. CLIO and the economics of QWERTY. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. (1985) 75:332–337Google Scholar
• De Fraja G., Delbono F. Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. J. Econom. Surveys (1990) 4:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolley A. IBM claims SCO conspiring with Microsoft over Linux. ZDNet Australia (2003) July 30). http://www.zdnet.co.nz/newstech/enterprise/storyGoogle Scholar
• Economist, The Collective intelligence—When the many know best. (2004) May 27Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16:70–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:940–955Google Scholar
• Fuller T. How Microsoft warded off rival software. New York Times (2003) May 15):C1Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P.Commitment (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Subirana B., Pham C. B. Linux in 2004. (2004) . Case 705407, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Jaffe S. Why Linux is giving Microsoft a migraine. Bus. Week (2001) February 22). http://ww.businessweek.com/dnflash/feb2001/nf20010222_369.htmGoogle Scholar
• Johnson J. P. Open source software: Private provision of a public good. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 11(4):637–662Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanellos M., Shankland S. Ballmer: No sleep lost over Linux. CNET News.com. (2003) . http://news.com.com/2008-1082-998297.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kogut B., Metiu A. Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2001) 17(2):248–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuan J. Understanding open source software: A nonprofit competitive threat. (1999) . Working paper, Sloan Software Industry Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2002) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumura T. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J. Public Econom. (1998) 70:473–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrill W., Schneider N. Government firms in oligopoly industries: A short-run analysis. Quart. J. Econom. (1966) 33:400–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Microsoft Get the facts. . Retrieved May 2006, http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/facts/default.mspxGoogle Scholar
• Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. D. A case study of open source software development: The Apache server. The ICSE 2000, Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. on Software Engrg., Limerick Ireland, June 4–11 (2000) Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar (1997) . http://www.catb.org/∼esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/Google Scholar
• Schafer S. Microsoft’s cultural revolution. Newsweek Internat. Ed. (2004) June 21):46–49Google Scholar
• Schmidt K. M., Schnitzer M. Public subsidies for open source? Some economic policy issues of the software market. (2002) . Working paper, SSRN, http://www.ssrn.comGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro C. The theory of business strategy. Rand J. Econom. (1989) 20(1):125–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12(1):49–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J.The Wisdom of Crowds (2004) (Doubleday-Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Thorn B. K., Connolly T. Discretionary data bases: A theory and some experimental findings. Comm. Res. (1987) 14(5):512–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu Xiaopeng. Development costs and open source software. (2002) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar