Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549

References

  • Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Bitzer J., Schroder P. Competition and innovation in a technology setting software duopoly. (2003) . Discussion Paper 363, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Caillaud B., Jullien B. Chicken and egg: Competing matchmakers. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):309–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Ghemawat P. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1072–1084LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N. Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):1165–1181Google Scholar
  • Economides N. The economics of networks. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 14(6):673–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N., Salop S. C. Competition and integration among complements, and network market structure. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):105–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Katz M. L. Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(4):413–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawer A., Cusumano M. A.Platform Leadership (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hagiu A. Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets. (2004) . Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson J. P. Open source software: Private provision of a public good. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2002) 11(4):637–662CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katsamakas E., Bakos Y. Design and ownership of two-sided networks. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(2):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. The open source movement: Key research questions. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2001) 45(4–6):819–826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J., Tirole J. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(2):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matutes C., Regibeau P. Mix and match: Product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(Summer):221–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mustonen M. Copyleft—The economics of Linux and other open source software. Inform. Econom. Policy (2003) 15(1):99–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mustonen M. When does a firm support substitute open source programming. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 14(1):121–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1494–1504LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors: Some economics of payment card associations. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(4):549–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Two-sided markets. Toulouse Conf. Two-Sided Markets (2005) . Working paper, Institut d’Economie Industrielle, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.