Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0551

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Alavi M., Leidner L. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25:107–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alder P. S., Kwon S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:17–40Google Scholar
  • Allison P.Event-History Analysis (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona D., Caldwell D. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Appleyard M. M. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:137–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bales R. F. A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1950) 15:257–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bales R. F., Parsons T., Bales R. F., Shils E. A. The equilibrium problem is small groups. Working Papers in the Theory of Action (1953) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) 111–161Google Scholar
  • Bales R. F., Slater S. P., Parsons T., Slater P. E. Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. The Family, Socialization and Interaction Processes (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) 259–306Google Scholar
  • Benbunan-Fich R., Hiltz S. R., Turoff M. A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems (2002) 34(4):457–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Columbia, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organ. Sci (2001) 12:198–213LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R., Lin N., Cook K., Burt R. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. Social Capital (2001) (Aldine de Gruyter, New York) 31–56Google Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:95–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):446–462LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Borgatti S. P., Parker A. Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Rev. (2002) 44:25–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci (2004) 50(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damsgaard J. Managing an Internet portal. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2002) 9:408–420Google Scholar
  • Damsgaard J., Horsti A., Nilsson O. Sustainable evolution of business models: Cases from Scandinavian Internet portal market. Proc. Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (2004) Turku, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dixon P. M., Weiner J., Mitchell-Olds T., Woodley R. Bootstrapping the Gini coefficient of inequality. Ecology (1987) 68:1548–1551CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:345–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fahey L., Prusak L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:265–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman S. The high cost of not finding information. KMWorld (2004) 13(March 1). http://www.kmworld.comGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1199–1215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gasser L., Ripoche G. Distributed collective practices and F/OSS problem management: Perspective and methods. Conf. Cooperation, Innovation, Tech. (2003) University de Technologie de Troyes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Gasser L., Scacchi W., Ripoche G., Penne B. Understanding continuous design in F/OSS projects. 16th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. Appl. (2003) Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environment: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gutzwiller M. C.Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (1990) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkle D. E., Wiersma W., Jurs S. G.Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (1994) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ho S. Encouraging online participation. Proc. 11th Ann. Teaching Learning Forum February 5–6 (2002) Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/tlf/2002/pub/docs/Ho.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Jones G., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15:194–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim A. J.Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities (2000) (Addison Wesley, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Klandermans B., Kriesberg L., Misztal B. Union action and the free-rider dilemma. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change, Vol. 10. Social Movements as a Factor of Change in the Contemporary World (1988) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Knock N. Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: An action research investigation of electronic communication in process involvement groups. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2002) 44:267–285Google Scholar
  • Koch S., Schneider G. Effort, cooperation and coordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Inform. Systems J. (2002) 12:27–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuk G. When to speak again: Self-regulation under facilitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Res. Practice (2000) 4:291–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuk G. Selection, cliques and knowledge sharing in open source software development communities. Proc. IADIS Internat. Conf. Web-Based Communities (2004) IADIS, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee G. K., Cole R. E. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):633–649LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leifer R., McDermont C. M., O’Connor G. C., Peters L. S., Rice M. P., Veryzer R. W., Rice M.Radical Innovation (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Madey G., Freeh V., Tynan R., Koch S. Modeling the F/OSS community: A quantitative investigation. Free/Open Source Software Development (2004) (Idea Publishing, Hersey, PA) 203–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence, and diffusion. Comm. Res. (1987) 14:491–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18:57–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marwell G., Oliver P.The Critical Mass in Collective Action (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald M. L., Westphal J. D. Getting by with the advice networks and firms’ strategic response to poor performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:1–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell S., Swan J., Galliers R. A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: The BPR example. Inform. Systems J. (2000) 10:239–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J. Community is dead; long live mega-collaboration. useit.com (1997) August 15). http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9708b.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Konno N. The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Rev (1998) 40:40–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company. Companies Create the Dynamics of Knowledge (1995) (Oxford University Press, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Oegema D., Klandermans B. Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1994) 59:703–722CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver P. E., Marwell G. The paradox of group size in collective action: A theory of the critical mass, II. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1988) 53:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver P., Marwell G. Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociol. Theory (2001) 19:292–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Goods (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Prahl R., Marwell G., Oliver P. E. Reach and selectivity as strategies of recruitment for collective action: A theory of the critical mass, V. J. Math. Sociol. (1991) 16:137–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Provan K. G., Sebastian J. G. Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:453–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raymond E. The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday (1999) . Retreived April 14, 2004, http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/raymond/Google Scholar
  • Robertson M., Swan J., Newell J. S. The role of networks in the diffusion of technological innovation. J. Management Stud. (1996) 33:335–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scacchi W. Free and open source development practices in the game community. IEEE Software (2004) 21:56–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shannon C. E., Weaver W.The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1949) (The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:125–134LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M., Smith M., Kollock P. Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Measuring and mapping the social structure of Usenet. Communities in Cyberspace (1999) (Routledge Press, London, UK) 195–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. K., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:9–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tabachnik B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (1989) 2nd ed.(Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Teigland R., Wasko M. McLure, Hildreth P., Kimble C. Extending richness with reach: Participation and knowledge exchange in electronic networks of practice. Knowledge Networks. Innovation Through Communities of Practice (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 230–242Google Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Thompson M. Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:151–164LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tuomi I.Corporate Knowledge. Theory and Practice of Intelligent Organizations (1999) (Metaxis, Helsinki, Finland) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. The role of relationships in interfirm knowledge transfer and learning: The case of corporate debt markets. Management Sci. (2003) 49:383–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovative model. Organ. Sci. (2003) 12:209–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. R. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1217–1241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittaker S., Terveen L., Hill W., Cherny L. The dynamics of mass interaction. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (1998) (ACM Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.