Vendor Certification and Appraisal: Implications for Supplier Quality

References

• Arya A., Glover J., Shivaramakrishnan K. The intereffort between decision and control problems and the value of information. Accounting Rev. (1997) 72:561–574Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Demski J. S. Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems. J. Accounting Res. (1980) 18:184–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Information, contracting and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789Link, Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Performance measurement and design in supply chains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):173–188Link, Google Scholar
• Balachandran K. R., Radhakrishnan S. Quality implication of warranties in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1266–1277Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y. K., Hausch D. Cooperative investments and the value of contracting: Coase vs. Williamson. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:125–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A., Takeishi A. Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-Transplant, and U.S. auto plants. (1991) . Working Paper 3256-91/BPS, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Deming W. E.Quality, Productivity, and Competitive Position (1982) (Center for Advanced Engineering Study, MIT, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Demski J. S., Frimor H., Sappington D. E. M. Efficient manipulation in a repeated setting. J. Accounting Res. (2004) 42(1):31–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowdell T. D., Govindaraj S., Jain P. C. The Tylenol incident, ensuing regulation, and stock prices. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1992) 27(2):283–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edlin A., Reichelstein S. Hold ups, standard breach remedies, and optimal investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:478–501Google Scholar
• Feltham G., Xie J. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal agent relations. Accounting Rev. (1994) 69(4):429–453Google Scholar
• Hansell S. Is this the factory of the future? New York Times (1998) July 26Google Scholar
• Hart O., Holmstrom B. The theory of contracts: Part I. Advances in Economic Theory (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heagy C. D. Determining optimal quality costs by considering cost of lost sales. J. Cost Management (1991) 4(3):64–72Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multi-task principal agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1991) 7(1):24–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horngren T. C., Foster G., Datar S. M.Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (2002) 11th ed.(Prentice-Hall, NJ) Google Scholar
• Isidore C. Ford recalls 13 million tires. CNN Money (2001) May 22). http://money.cnn.com/2001/05/22/recalls/ford/index.htmGoogle Scholar
• Jusko J. Always lessons to learn. IndustryWeek (1999) February 15). http://www.industryweek.com/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=254Google Scholar
• Lamming R. Squaring lean supply with supply chain management. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1996) 18(2):183–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson M. Auto industry sees: Future of vision inspection. Quality (1998) 37(6):53–55Google Scholar
• Experts combine to cut CMM inspection costsManufacturingtalk (2002) November 26). http://www.manufacturingtalk.com/news/dea/dea121.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Mckeefry H. Building a total quality system. Electronic News (2000) 46(45):46Google Scholar
• McPhillips C. V. Buying and selling overseas. Bus. Law Today (2004) 13(3):11Google Scholar
• Murray J. United Nation's CISG: Part 3. Purchasing (1999) 127(9):23–25Google Scholar
• Noldeke G., Schmidt K. M. Options contracts and renegotiation: A solution to the hold up problem. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26:163–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orsini J. Simple rule to reduce total quality cost of inspection and correction of product in a state of chaos. (1982) . Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Pearch C., McRoberts W. A. Quality standards for tooling and equipment. Mach. Design (2000) 72(2):568–571Google Scholar
• ISO 9000, ISO 14000 certificates reach record levels in 2001Quality Progress (2002) 35(10):21–22Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S., Srinidhi B. Should quality be designed in or inspected in? A cost of quality framework. Quality Management J. (1994) 2(Fall):72–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reyniers D. J., Tapiero C. S. Contract design and the control of quality in a conflictual environment. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1995a) 82(4):373–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reyniers D. J., Tapiero C. S. The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts. Management Sci. (1995b) 41(10):1581–1589Link, Google Scholar
• Sewell K. ISO 9000 certification. Military Aerospace Electronics (1995) 6(8):1–2Google Scholar
• Sower V., Motwani J., Savoie M. Are acceptance sampling and SPC complementary or incompatible? Quality Progress (1993) 26(9):85–90Google Scholar
• Starkman D. Award of $738,000 is upheld in clams case. The Wall Street Journal (1997) March 13):A12Google Scholar
• Stevenson T. H., Barnes F. C. Fourteen years of ISO 9000: Impact, criticisms, costs, and benefits. Bus. Horizons (2001) 44(3):45–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taguchi G., Elsayed E. A., Hsiang T. C.Quality Engineering in Production Systems (1989) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Teresko J. Better vision. Industry Week (2002) 251(12):16Google Scholar
• Weston F. C. What do managers really think of the ISO 9000 registration process? Quality Progress (1995) 28(10):67–73Google Scholar
• Zuckerman A. The high price of admission. Appliance Manufacturer (1994) 42(5):8–10Google Scholar