Transshipment of Inventories Among Retailers: Myopic vs. Farsighted Stability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0558

References

  • Anupindi R., Bassok Y., Zemel E. Study of decentralized distribution systems: Part II—Applications. (1999) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Anupindi R., Bassok Y., Zemel E. A general framework for the study of decentralized distribution systems. Manufacturing Services Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):349–368LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R. J., Tucker A. W., Luce R. D. Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV (1959) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 287–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R. J., Dreze J. H. Cooperative games with coalition structures. Internat. J. Game Theory (1974) 3(4):217–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axäter S. A new decision rule for lateral transshipments in inventory systems. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1168–1179LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartholdi J. J., Ziya E. Kemahlioglu. Centralizing inventory in the supply chains by using Shapley values to allocate the profits. (2005) . Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Netessine S., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z.-J. Game theory in supply chain analysis. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 13–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chwe M. S.-Y. Farsighted coalitional stability. J. Econom. Theory (1994) 63:299–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dong L., Rudi N. Who benefits from transshipment? Exogenous vs. endogenous wholesale prices. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):645–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gillies D. B., Tucker A. W., Luce R. D. Solutions to general non-zero sum games. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV (1959) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 47–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granot D., Sošić G. A three-stage model for a decentralized distribution system of retailers. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(5):771–784LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granot D., Sošić G. Formation of alliances in Internet-based supply exchanges. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):92–105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J., Aumann R. J., Hart S. Coalition structures. Handbook of Game Theory (1994) 2(Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1305–1337Google Scholar
  • Hartman B. C., Dror M., Shaked M. Cores of inventory centralization games. Games Econom. Behav. (2000) 31(1):26–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konishi H., Ray D. Coalition formation as a dynamic process. J. Econom. Theory (2003) 110(1):1–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masuda T., Suzuki A., Muto S. Farsighted von Neumann–Morgenstern stability leads to efficiency in oligopoly markets. (2000) . Working paper, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M., Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains (the assembly problem). (2002) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M., Sošić G. Stable farsighted coalitions in competitive markets. Management Sci. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M., Sošić G. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Narus J. A., Anderson J. C. Rethinking distribution: Adaptive channels. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) July–August):112–120Google Scholar
  • Owen G. On the core of linear production games. Math. Programming (1975) 9(1):358–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck E. L., Taylor T. A. Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation for design of supply contracts. (2004) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Rudi N., Kapur S., Pyke D. F. A two-location inventory model with transshipment and local decision making. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1668–1680LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapley L. S., Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W. A value for N-person games. Contribution to the Theory of Games (1953) 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 307–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wee K. W., Dada M. Optimal policies for transshipping inventory in a retail network. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1519–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xue L. Coalitional stability under perfect foresight. Econom. Theory (1998) 11(3):603–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J. Transshipment and its impact on supply chain members' performance. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1534–1539LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao H., Deshpande V., Ryan J. Inventory sharing and rationing in decentralized dealer networks. Management Sci. (2004) 51(4):531–547LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.