The Promise of Research on Open Source Software

References

• Asklund U., Bendix L. A study of configuration management in open source software projects. IEE Proc. (2002) 149(1):40–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):305–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Rossi C. Why open source software can succeed? Res. Policy (2003) 32:1243–1258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K., Annabi H., Howison J., Masango C. Towards a portfolio of FLOSS project success measures. (2004) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved April 4, 2006, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/crowston04towards.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Cusumano M., Gawer A. The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(3):51–58Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy (2005) 34(4):481–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle J.-M., David P. A. The allocation of software development resources in “open source” production mode. (2003) . Discussion Paper 02-27, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Dalle J.-M., Julien N. “Libre” software: Turning fads into institutions? Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dam K. W. Some economic considerations in the intellectual property protection of software. J. Legal Stud. (1995) 24(2):321–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., Koestner R., Ryan R. M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(6):627–668Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dempsey B. J., Weiss D., Jones P., Greenberg J. Who is an open source developer? Comm. ACM (2002) 45(2):67–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duyk G. Attrition and translation. Science (2003) 302(5645):603–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller J., Fitzgerald B. A framework for understanding the open source software development paradigm. ICIS Conf. Proc., Atlanta (2000) Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA:58–69Google Scholar
• Franck E., Jungwirth C. Reconciling investors and donators: The governance structure of open source. (2002) . Working Paper 8, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Franke N., von Hippel E. Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache security software. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1199–1215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gacek C., Arief B. The many meanings of open source software. IEEE Software (2004) 21(1):34–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan M. J. Striking a balance between trust and control in virtual organizations: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):277–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Jain S., Kumaraswamy A. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of SUN Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):196–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh R. A., Glott R., Krieger B., Robles G. Free/Libre and open source software: Survey and study. (2002) . Working paper, International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Grand S., von Krogh G., Leonard D., Swap W. Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for open source innovation. Long Range Planning (2004) 37(6):591–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granstrand O.The Economics and Management of Intellectural Property (1999) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Hann I., Roberts J., Slaughter S., Fielding R. An empirical analysis of economic returns to open source participation. (2006) . Working Paper 2006-E5, Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Harhoff D., Henkel J., von Hippel E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Res. Policy (2003) 32(10):1753–1769Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hars A., Ou S. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(3):25–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heller M., Eisenberg R. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science (1998) 280:698–701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J., Uhr W., Esswein W., Schoop W. Software development in embedded Linux: Informal collaboration of competing firms. Proc. 6. Internat. Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik Physica (2003) Verlag, Heidelberg, GermanyCrossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributions to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1159–1177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Fredriksen L. Why firm-established user communities work for innovation: The personal attributes of innovation users in the case of computer-controlled music. Organ. Sci. (2006) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Koch S., Schneider G. Effort, cooperation, and coordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Inform. Systems J. (2002) 12(1):27–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Metiu A. Open source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2001) 17(2):248–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuan J. Open source software as lead-user’s make or buy decision: A study of open and closed source quality. (2002) . Working paper, Stanford Institute of Economic Policy Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lakhani K., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K., Wolf B., Bates J., DiBona C. The Boston Consulting Group hacker survey. (2002) . Boston Consulting Group Report. Retrieved April 4th, 2006, http://www.osdn.com/bcgGoogle Scholar
• Lanzara G. V., Morner M. The knowledge ecology of open source software projects. 19th EGOS Colloquium, Copenhagen, Denmark (2003) Google Scholar
• Lee G., Cole R. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):633–649Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. (2002) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lin Y. The institutionalization of hacking practices. Ubiquity (2003) 4(4):18–24Google Scholar
• Merrill W., Schneider N. Government firms in oligopoly industries. A short-run analysis. Quart. J. Econom. (1966) 33:400–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E., Oesterlie T., Rolland K. R., Royrvik E. Keeping it going: The everyday practices of open source software. (2004) . Working paper, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
• Mustonen M. Copyleft: The economics of Linux and other open source software. (2003) . Discussion Paper 493, Department of Economics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Mustonen M. When does a firm support substitute open source programming? J. Econom. Management Strategy (2005) 14(1):121–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonneke B., Preece J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2000) (Association for Computing Machinery, ACM Press, New York) 73–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterloh M., Rota S., von Wartburg I. Open source: New rules in software development. (2004) . Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Raymond E.The Cathedral and the Bazaar (1999) (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawyer S., Guinan P. J. Software development: Process and performance. IBM Systems J. (1998) 37(4):552–569Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scacchi W. Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Software Proc. (2002) 149(1):24–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stenborg M. Explaining open source. (2004) . Working Paper 947, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Tuomi I.Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Ulhoi J. P. Open source development: A hybrid in innovation and management theory. Management Decision (2004) 42(9):1095–1114Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open source software. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(4):82–86Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. Betriebswirtschaft (2005) 55(1):63–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:209–225Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Haefliger S. Knowledge reuse in open source software: An exploratory study of 15 open source projects. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) IEEE, Los Alamitos, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1217–1241Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1258–1286Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J., O’Mahony S. Contrasting community building in sponsored and community founded open source projects. Proc. 38th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2005) IEEE, Los Alamitos, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Yamauchi Y., Yokozawa M., Shinohara T., Ishida T. Collaboration with lean media: How open source software succeeds. ACM 2000 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work, Philadelphia (2000) (ACM Press, New York) 329–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeitlyn D. Gift economies in the development of open source software: Anthropological reflections. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1287–1291Crossref, Google Scholar