Partnership in a Dynamic Production System with Unobservable Actions and Noncontractible Output

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0569

References

  • Abreu D. On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica (1988) 56(3):386–396Google Scholar
  • Abreu D., Milgrom P., Pearce D. Information and timing in repeated partnerships. Econometrica (1991) 59(6):1713–1733CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abreu D., Pearce D., Stacchetti E. Optimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoring. J. Econom. Theory (1986) 39(1):251–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkins D., Krishnan H., Zhao X. Relational price-only contract in supply chains. (2005) . Working paper, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Bringing the market inside the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):212–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):39–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doornik K. Relational contracting in partnerships. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the automobile industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(4):271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Chu W. The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2000) 31(2):259–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Levine D., Maskin E. The folk theorem with imperfect public information. Econometrica (1994) 62(5):997–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heidi J. B., Miner A. S. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):324–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Schwarz L. B., Zenios S. A. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kenworthy L., Macaulay S., Rogers J. “The more things change…”: Business litigation and governance in the American automobile industry. Law Soc. Inquiry (1996) 21(3):631–678Google Scholar
  • Klein B., Leffler K. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(4):615–641CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J. J., Tirole J. Adverse selection and renegotiation in procurement. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57(4):597–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin J. Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):835–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rayo L. Relational team incentives and ownership. (2004) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Rey P., Salanie B. On the value of commitment with asymmetric information. Econometrica (1996) 64(6):1395–1414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson D., Stuart T. Just how incomplete are incomplete contracts? Evidence from biotech strategic alliances. J. Financial Econom. (2002) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Rogerson W. P. The first-order approach to principal-agent problems. Econometrica (1985) 53(6):1357–1368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):97–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sako M.Prices, Quality, and Trust (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweitzer M. E., Hershey J. C., Bradlow E. T. Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. (2005) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Tarski A. A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific J. Math. (1955) 5:285–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C. R., Wiggins S. N. Competition or compensation: Supplier incentives under the American and Japanese subcontracting systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(4):598–618Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.