Design of Robust Business-to-Business Electronic Marketplaces with Guaranteed Privacy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0570

References

  • Anderson J., Anderson E. The new e-commerce intermediaries. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43(4):53–62Google Scholar
  • Awad N. F., Krishnan M. S. The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):13–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aweya J., Oullette M., Montuno D. Y., Doray B., Felske K. An adaptive load balancing scheme for Web servers. Internat. J. Network Management (2002) 12:3–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A., Muylle S. Online support for commerce processes by Web retailers. Decision Support Systems Electronic Commerce (2003) 34(4):379–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt F., Klusch M., Zambonelli F. Cryptographic protocols for secure second-price auctions. Cooperative Information Agents V: 5th International Workshop, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2001) 2182(Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 154–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaum D. Security without identification: Transaction systems to make big brother obsolete. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(10):1030–1044CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franklin M. K., Reiter M. K. The design and implementation of a secure auction service. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1996) 22(5):302–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freedman M. J., Morris R. Tarzan: A peer-to-peer anonymizing network layer. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Comput. Comm. Security (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 193–206Google Scholar
  • Goldschlag D. M., Reed M. G., Syverson P. F. Onion routing for anonymous and private Internet connections. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(2):84–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevi S., Krawczyk H. Public-key cryptography and password protocols. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security (1999) 2(3):230–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaiswal A., Kim Y., Gini M. Security model for a multi-agent marketplace. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 119–124Google Scholar
  • Kambil A., van Heck E. Reengineering the Dutch flower auctions: A framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lipmaa H., Asokan N., Niemi V., Blaze M. Secure Vickrey auctions without threshold trust. Financial Cryptography 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2002) 2357(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 87–101Google Scholar
  • Lomas T. M. A. SET protocol description: HTML annotations. (1996) . Computer Security Group, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Moh T., Blum M., Lee C. H. A fast public key system with signature and master key functions. Proc. 1999 Workshop on Cryptographic Techniques and E-Commerce (CrypTEC’99) (1999) (Hong Kong City University Press, Hong Kong) 63–69Google Scholar
  • Ogut H., Raghunathan S., Cavusoglu H. Intrusion detection policies for IT security breaches. Proc. 13th Workshop Inform. Technologies Systems (2003) Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Pfitzmann B., Waidner M., Pfitzmann A. Secure and anonymous electronic commerce: Providing legal certainty in open digital systems without compromizing anonymity. (2000) . IBM Research Report RZ 3304 (93350), IBM Research Division, Zürich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  • Reiter M. K., Rubin A. D. Crowds: Anonymity for Web transactions. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security (1998) 1(1):66–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivest R. L., Shamir A., Wagner D. A. Time-lock puzzles and timed-release crypto. (1996) . Technical Report MIT/LCS/TR–684, MIT, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Schneier B.Applied Cryptography (1996) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schneider G. P.Electronic Commerce (2003) 4th ed.(Course Technology, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stubblebine S. G., Syverson P. F., Goldschlag D. M. Unlinkable serial transactions: Protocols and applications. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security (1999) 2(4):354–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wolf J. L., Yu P. S. On balancing the load in a clustered Web farm. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. (2001) 1(2):231–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency in electronic marketplaces: Why data transparency may hinder the adoption of B2B exchanges. Electronic Markets (2002) 12(2):92–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic marketplaces: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–679LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.