Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias

References

• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(3):487–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):289–309Link, Google Scholar
• Amaral L. A. N., Scala A., Barthelemy M., Stanley H. E. Classes of small world networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97(21):11149–11152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B., Dosi G. Competing technologies: An overview. Technology Change and Economic Theory (1987) (Columbia University Press, New York) 590–607Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99(394):116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B.Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur W. B. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):101–109Google Scholar
• Axelrod R. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. J. Conflict Resolution (1997) 41(2):203–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási A.-L., Albert R., Hawoong J. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A (1999) 272:173–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett G.A., Kochen M. Approaches to non-Euclidean network analysis. The Small World (1989) (Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 349–372Google Scholar
• Bollobás B.Random Graphs (1985) (Academic Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Cowan R., Miller J. H. Technological standards with local externalities and decentralized behavior. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1998) 8:285–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A., Mylonadis Y., Rosenbloom R. S. Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: The triumph of VHS over Beta. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1992) 66(1):51–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdős P., Rényi A. On random graph I. Publ. Math. Debrecen (1959) 6:290–297Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Klemperer P. Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. (2001) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncement, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):940–944Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):9–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory (1983) 1:203–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):822–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Product introduction with network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):55–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly K.New Rules for the New Economy: Ten Radical Strategies for a Connected World (1998) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kristiansen E. G. R&D in the presence of network externalities: Timing and compatibility. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(3):531–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Robertson P. L. Network and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Res. Policy (1992) 21:297–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J., Song J. Incompatible entry in small-world networks. The Wharton Technology Mini-Conference, April 25 (2003) The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J.Re-Thinking the Network Economy: The True Forces that Drive the Digital Marketplace (2002) (Amacom, New York) Google Scholar
• Ravasz E., Barabási A.-L. Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Rev. E (2003) 67:026112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rohlfs J. H.Bandwagon Effects in High-Technology Industries (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen E.The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing (2000) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Strogatz S. H. Exploring complex networks. Nature (2001) 401(8):268–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strogatz S. H.Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order (2003) (Hyperion Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Strouse K. G.Marketing Telecommunications Services: New Approaches for a Changing Environment (2001) (Artech House, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Watts D. J.Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness (1999) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393(4):440–442Crossref, Google Scholar