Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583

References

  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47(3):295–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1991) 50(2):179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Joachimsthaler E. A. Revisiting DSS implementation research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quart. (1992) 16:95–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang J., Soh P. H. User information satisfaction, job satisfaction, and computer background: An exploratory study. Inform. Management (1997) 32(5):255–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey J. E., Pearson S. W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):530–545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bajaj A. S., Nidumolu R. A feedback model to understand information system usage. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):213–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamberger P. A., Kluger A. N., Suchard R. The antecedents and consequences of union commitment: A meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (1999) 47(3):304–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Barki H., Hartwick J. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(1):59–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baronas A. K., Louis M. R. Restoring a sense of control during implementation: How user involvement leads to system acceptance. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(1):111–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baroudi J. J., Olson M. H., Ives B. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Comm. ACM (1986) 29(3):232–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Bonnett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(3):588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M. W., Cudeck R. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1993) 24(4):445–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S. P., Peterson R. A. Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(1):63–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines E., McIver J., Bohrnstedt G. B. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. Social Measurement: Current Issues (1981) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 65–115Google Scholar
  • Choe J. The relationships among performance of accounting information systems, influence factors, and evolution level of information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 12(4):215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper H., Hedges L. V.The Handbook of Research Synthesis (1994) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1001LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H. Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(1):51–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denison D. R., Hart S. L., Kahn J. A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):1005–1024CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J. Avenues for top management involvement in successful MIS development. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(1):17–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egger M., Ebrahim S. H., Smith G. D. Where now for meta-analysis? Internat. J. Epidemiology (2002) 31(1):1–5CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Guimaraes T., Igbaria M. Client/server system success: Exploring the human side. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(4):851–876CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guimaraes T., Staples D. S., McKeen J. D. Empirically testing some main user-related factors for systems development quality. Quality Management J. (2003) 10(4):39–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guinan P. J., Cooprider J. G., Faraj S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):101–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hedges L. V., Olkin I.Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1985) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Hirschheim R., Lacity M. The myths and realities of information technology insourcing. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(2):99–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L.Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (1990) (Sage Publications, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Igbaria M. End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model. Omega (1990) 18(6):637–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., Davis B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 11(4):87–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ives B., Olson M. H. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Management Sci. (1984) 30(5):586–603LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ives B., Olson M. H., Baroudi J. L. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Comm. ACM (1983) 26(10):785–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Ives B. Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(2):205–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide (2001) 2nd ed.(Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Lamb R., Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):197–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S. M., Kim Y. R., Lee J. An empirical study of the relationships among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 12(2):189–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcoulides G. A., Hick R. H. Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(2):209–225LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markus L. M. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Comm. ACM (1983) 26:430–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mawhinney C. H., Lederer A. L. A study of personal computer utilization by managers. Inform. Management (1990) 18(5):243–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker C. P., Baltes B. B., Young S. A., Huff J. W., Altmann R. A., Lacost H. A., Roberts J. E. Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24(4):389–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purvis R. L., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):117–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A., Lang S. S., Welker R. B. Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):50–69LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roth P. L., Bobko P., McFarland L. A. A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psych. (2005) 58(4):1009–1037CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., King W. R. An empirical taxonomy of the decision-making processes concerning strategic applications of information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1995) 11(4):177–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders G. L., Courtney J. F. A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(1):77–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seddon P. B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi V., King R. C. Nonlinear and noncompensatory models in information satisfaction measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(1):87–96LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma R., Yetton P. The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(4):533–555CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tett R. P., Meyer J. P. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytical findings. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46(2):259–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson R. L., Higgins C. A., Howell J. M. Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):125–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thong J. Y. L., Yap C., Raman K. S. Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(2):248–267LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Torkzadeh G., Dhillon G. Measuring factors that influence the success of Internet commerce. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):187–206LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis H. C.Attitude and Attitude Change (1971) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viswesvaran C., Ones D. S. Theory testing: Combing psychometric meta-analysis and structural equation modeling. Personnel Psych. (1998) 48:865–885CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V.Work and Motivation (1964) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williams C. R., Livingstone L. P. Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(2):269–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wixom B., Todd P. A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):85–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yap C. S. Issues in managing information technology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1989) 40(7):649–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.