Impact of Licensing on Investment and Financing of Technology Development

References

• Cusumano M. A., Selby R. W.Microsoft Secrets (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont C., Jacquemin A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(5):1133–1137Google Scholar
• Davis J. L., Harrison S. S.Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets (2001) (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dixit A. The role of investment in entry deterrence. Econom. J. (1980) 90:95–106Google Scholar
• Dixit A., Pindyck R. S.Investment Under Uncertainty (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Gallini N. T. Second-sourcing as a commitment: Monopoly incentives to attract competition. Quart. J. Econom. (1988) 103:673–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankel A. The willing partner. Tech. Rev. (2005) 108(7):36–38Google Scholar
• Froot K. A., Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C. Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. J. Finance (1993) 48(5):1629–1658Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallini N. Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(5):931–941Google Scholar
• Gans J. S., Hsu D. H., Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(4):571–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldscheider R. The negotiation of royalties and other sources of income from licensing. IDEA: J. Law Tech. (1995) 36:1–17Google Scholar
• Gompers P. A., Lerner J.The Venture Capital Cycle (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Green J. R., Scotchmer S. On the division of profit in sequential innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(1):20–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grenadier S. R. The strategic exercise of options: Development cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets. J. Finance (1996) 51(5):1653–1679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H. The financing of research and development. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2002) 18(1):35–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. G. Capital-market imperfections and investment. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36:193–225Google Scholar
• Kamien M. I., Aumann R. J., Hart S. Patent licensing. Handbook of Game Theory (1992) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 332–354Google Scholar
• Kamien M. I., Tauman Y. Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quart. J. Econom. (1986) 101:471–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamien M. I., Tauman Y. Patent licensing: The inside story. Manchester School (2002) 70:7–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. On the licensing of an innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16:504–520Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econom. (1986) 101:567–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kende M. Profitability under an open versus a closed system. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1998) 7:307–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulatilaka N., Perotti E. Strategic growth options. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1021–1031Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Merges R. The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):121–156Google Scholar
• McDonald R. L., Siegel D. R. The value of waiting to invest. Quart. J. Econom. (1986) 101(4):707–728Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mock D.The Qualcomm Equation (2005) (American Management Association, New York) Google Scholar
• Rostoker M. A survey of corporate licensing. IDEA: J. Law Tech. (1984) 24:59–92Google Scholar
• Shepard A. Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies. RAND J. Econom. (1987) 18:360–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica (1984) 52(1):101–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X. H. Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly. J. Econom. Bus. (2002) 54:253–266Crossref, Google Scholar