Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0593

References

  • Ahuja G., Lampert C. M. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:521–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albaum G. Selecting specialized creators: The independent inventor. Psych. Rep. (1976) 39:173–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altshuller G. S., Williams Anthony. Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems (1984) (Gordon and Breach, New York) Google Scholar
  • Amabile T. M. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1982) 43:997–1013CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 45:357–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amabile T. M., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1988) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 123–167Google Scholar
  • Art Fry and the Invention of Post-it NotesRetrieved July 20, 2005, http://www.3m.com/about3M/pioneers/fry.jhtmlGoogle Scholar
  • Barron F.Creative Person and Creative Process (1969) (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Barron F., Harrington D. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Rev. Psych. (1981) 32:439–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bareby-Meyer Y., Moran S., Unger-Aviram E. When performance goals deter performance: Transfer of skills in integrative negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 93(2):142–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett F. C.Thinking (1958) (Allen & Unwin, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Basadur M. Managing creativity: A Japanese model. Acad. Management Executive (1992) 6(2):29–41Google Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:259–275LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:676–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besnard D., Cacitti L. Interface changes causing accidents: An empirical study of negative transfer. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2005) 62(1):105–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blossfeld H. P., Rohwer G.Techniques of Event History Modeling (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Brophy D. R. Understanding, measuring and enhancing individual creative problem solving efforts. Creativity Res. J. (1998) 2:123–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110:349–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatman J. A., Barsade S. Personality, culture and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):423–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi H. S., Thompson L. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 98(2):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R., Kallgren C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 39:406–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J. C., Porras J. I.Built to Last (1994) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dennis W. Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. J. Gerontology (1966) 21:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncker K. On problem solving. Psych. Monographs (1945) 58(5Google Scholar
  • Ernst H., Leptien C., Vitt J. Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47:184–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feist G. J. Personality and working style predictors of integrative complexity: A study of scientists thinking about research and teaching. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 3:474–484CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman D. C. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(1):47–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Haleblian J. Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):36–47LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47:117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn F. J., Chatman J. A., Cartwright S., Cooper C., Earley C., Chatman J., Cummings T., Holden N., Sparrow P., Starbuck W. Strong cultures and innovation: Oxymoron or opportunity? International Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (2001) (John Wiley and Sons, Sussex, UK) 263–287Google Scholar
  • Ford D. Y., Harris J. J. The elusive definition of creativity. J. Creative Behav. (1992) 26:186–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilman J. J.Inventivity: The Art and Science of Research Management (1992) (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guilford J. P. The structure of intellect. Psych. Bull. (1956) 33:267–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagedoorn J., Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Res. Policy (2003) 32:1365–1379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R. Research, development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1670–1688LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He Z. L., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helson R. In search of the creative personality. Creativity Res. J. (1996) 9:295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herbig P., Jacobs L. Creative problem solving styles in the U.S.A. and Japan. Internat. Marketing Rev. (1996) 13(2):63–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:70–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • House R., Rousseau D. M., Thomas-Hunt M. The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. (1995) 17:71–114Google Scholar
  • Houtz J. C., Selby E., Esquivel G. B., Okoye R. A., Peters K. M., Treffinger D. J. Creativity styles and personality type. Creativity Res. J. (2003) 15(4):321–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber J. C. Invention and inventitivity is a random, Poisson process: A potential guide to analysis of general creativity. Creativity Res. J. (1998) 11(3):231–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M.Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kanter R. M., Staw B., Cummings L. L. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1988) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 169–211Google Scholar
  • Kasof J. Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Res. J. (1997) 10:303–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T., Holland W. E. The measurement of performance among R&D professional employees: A longitudinal analysis. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1982) 29:54–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. (1976) 6(5):622–629CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirton M. J. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. (1987) 61:622–629CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirton M. J.Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving (1994) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kuhn T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1970) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Lee J., Lee J., Lee H. Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Sci. (2003) 49:553–570LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lotka A. J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Washington Acad. Sci. (1926) 16:317–323Google Scholar
  • Lubart T. I., Sternberg R. J. Creativity across cultures. Handbook of Creativity (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 339–350Google Scholar
  • Luchins A. S. Mechanization in problem solving. Psych. Monographs (1942) 54(248Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. E.Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition (1992) (Worth Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • McPherson J. H., Taylor C. W., Barron F. A proposal for establishing ultimate criteria for measuring creative output. Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development (1963) (Wiley, New York) 24–29Google Scholar
  • Mednick S. A. The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. (1962) 69:230–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller A. I.Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moscovici S.Social Influence and Social Change (1976) (Academic Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Mumford M. D. Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock of creativity research. Creativity Res. J. (2003) 15:107–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mumford M. D., Gustafson S. B. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application and innovation. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes and judgments. Soc. Cognition (1995) 13:273–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. Managing innovation: When less is more. California Management Rev. (1997) 40:59–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. J., Goncalo J. A. Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors. Creativity Res. J. (2005) 17:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemeth C. J., Wachtler J. Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1983) 13:45–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Reilly C. A., Chatman J. A., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior (1996) 18(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Osborne A. F.Applied Imagination (1957) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pakes A., Shankerman M., Griliches Z. The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private return to research resources. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 73–88Google Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 29:89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100(5):1224–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Proctor T., Hua Tan K., Fuse K. Cracking the incremental paradigm of Japanese creativity. Creativity Innovation Management (2004) 13(4):207–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossman J.The Psychology of the Inventor (1931) (Inventor Publishing Company, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T., Deeds D. L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:201–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Creative productivity, age and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35:805–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Creativity, productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Rev. (1984) 4:77–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Quality, quantity and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. Internat. J. Aging Human Development (1985) 21:241–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psych. Rev. (1997) 104:66–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person and process perspectives. Psych. Bull. (2004) 129(4):475–494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S. M., Paulus P. B., Nijstad B. A. The constraining effects of initial ideas. Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S. M., Ward T. B., Finke R. A., Smith S. M., Ward T. B., Finke R. A. Cognitive processes in creative contexts. The Creative Cognition Approach (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1–7Google Scholar
  • Smith S. M., Ward T. B., Schumacher J. S. Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory Cognition (1993) 21:837–845CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen J. The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 77:70–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorensen J., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:81–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Bias information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48(6):1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Ford C. M., Gioia D. A. Why no one really wants creativity. Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory Tower Visions & Real World Voices (1995) 161–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Sandelands L., Dutton J. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein M. I.Stimulating Creativity (1974) 1(Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Are cognitive styles still in style? Amer. Psych. (1997) 52(7):700–712CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg R. J., Lubart T. I.Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sternberg R. J., Kaufman J. C., Pretz J. E. A propulsion model of creative leadership. Leadership Quart. (2003) 14:455–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R. I., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:685–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor I. A., Smith P. The nature of the creative process. Creativity: An Examination of the Creative Process (1959) (Hastings House Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Torrance E. P. Stimulation, enjoyment and originality in dyadic creativity. J. Ed. Psych. (1971) 62:43–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torrance E. P., Sternberg R. J. The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The Nature of Creativity (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office What is a patent? . Retrieved September 12, 2004, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#patentGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E., Thomke S., Sonnack M. Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):47–57Google Scholar
  • Ward T. B. Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psych. (1994) 27:1–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward T. B. Cognition, creativity and entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing (2004) 19:173–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner R. P.Creativity and Beyond: Cultures, Values, and Change (2000) (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) Google Scholar
  • Whole Story: A NOTE-able AchievementRetrieved September 12, 2004, http://www.3m.com/us/office/postit/learn_history_story.jhtmlGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.