Equivalent Information for Multiobjective Interactive Procedures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0595

References

  • Caballero R., Luque M., Molina J., Ruiz F. PROMOIN: An interactive system for multiobjective programming. Internat. J. Inform. Tech. Decision Making (2002) 1:635–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chankong V., Haimes Y.Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology (1983) (North-Holland, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. S. Interactive goal programming (IGP). Management Sci. (1972) 19:62–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gardiner L., Steuer R. E. Unified interactive multiple objective programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 74:391–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Dyer J. S., Feinberg A. An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Sci. (1972) 19:357–368LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanne T.Intelligent Strategies for Meta Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kaliszewski I.Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaliszewski I. Out of the mist—Towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 158:293–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P., Laakso J. A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem (VIA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1986) 24:277–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miettinen K.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Miettinen K., Ehrgott M., Gandibleux X. Interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures. Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys (2002) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Musselman K., Tavalage J. A tradeoff cut approach to multiple objective optimization. Oper. Res. (1980) 28:1424–1435LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nakayama H., Sawaragi Y., Grauer M., Wierzbicki A. P. Satisfying tradeoff method for multiobjective programming. Interactive Decision Analysis. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1984) 229(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 113–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sakawa M. Interactive multiobjective decision making by the sequential proxy optimization technique: SPOT. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1982) 9:386–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin W. S., Ravindran A. Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I—Continuous case. Comput. Oper. Res. (1991) 18:97–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E., Choo E. U. An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming. Math. Programming (1983) 26:326–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (1986) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A. P. Basic properties of scalarizing functionals for multiobjective optimization. Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik. s. Optimization (1977) 8:55–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A. P., Fandel G., Gal T. The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Theory and Application. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1980) 177(Berlin, Germany)468–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierzbicki A. P., Karwan M. H., Spronk J., Wallenius J. Convergence of interactive procedures of multiobjective optimization and decision support. Essays in Decision Making: A Volume in Honour of Stanley Zionts (1997) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 19–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.