The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0600

References

  • Atasu A., Sarvary M., Van Wassenhove L. N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. (2005) . Working Paper 2005/63/TOM/MKT, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Ayres R. U., Ferrer G., Van Leynseele T. Eco-efficiency, asset recovery, and remanufacturing. Eur. Management J. (1997) 15(5):557–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Behrendt S., Pfitzner R., Kreibich R.Wettbewerbsvorteile Durch Ökologische Dienstleisungen (1999) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beullens P. Location, process selection, and vehicle routing models for reverse logistics. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Industrial Management, KU Leuven, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Billington C., Lee H. L., Tang C. S. Successful strategies for product rollovers. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(3):23–30Google Scholar
  • Blackburn J. D., Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N., Souza G. C. Reverse supply chains for commercial returns. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(2):6–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. B.Product Stewardship and the Coming Age of Take-back (1996) (Business and the Environment, Cutter Information Corp., Arlington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Debo L., Toktay B., Van Wassenhove L. N. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1193–1205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dekker R., Fleischmann M., Inderfurth K., Van Wassenhove L. N.Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed Loop Supply Chains (2004) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebeling C.An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering (1996) 1st ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ferguson M., Toktay B. Manufacturer strategies in response to remanufacturing competition. Production Oper. Management (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrer G. The economics of tire remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation Recycling (1997b) 19:221–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrer G., Whybark D. C. Material planning for a remanufacturing facility. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):112–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flapper S. D. P., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Van Wassenhove L. N.Managing Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2005) (Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M.Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2001) 501(Springer, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J., Dekker R., van der Laan E., van Nunen J. A. E. E., Van Wassenhove L. N. Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103:1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geyer R., Jackson T. Supply loops and their constraints: The industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(2):55–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsburg J. Manufacturing: Once is not enough. Bus. Week (2001) April 16):B128–B129Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R. Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18:467–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N. Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):142–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Van Wassenhove L. N.Business Aspects of Closed Loop Supply Chains: Exploring the Issues (2003) (Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Harrison T. P., Van Wassenhove L. N. The challenge of closed-loop supply chains. Interfaces (2003a) 33(6):3–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Kraus M. E., Srivastava R. Scheduling policies for remanufacturing. Internat. J. Production Res. (1997) 48(2):1081–1091Google Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Teunter R. H., Van Wassenhove L. N. Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003b) 5(4):303–317LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guide V. D. R., Jayaraman V., Srivastava R., Benton W. C. Supply chain management for recoverable manufacturing systems. Interfaces (1998) 30(3):125–142LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeble J. From hackers to knackers. Supplement Online, The Guardian (1998) May 21Google Scholar
  • Klausner M., Grimm W. M., Hendrickson C. Reuse of electric motors in customer products. J. Indust. Ecology (1998) 2(2):89–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kodak 1998 Corporate Environment Annual Report. (1999) (The Kodak Corporation, Rochester, NY) Google Scholar
  • Kodak 2000 Health, Safety and Environment Annual Report. (2001) (The Kodak Corporation, Rochester, NY) Google Scholar
  • Lund R. T.Remanufacturing: United States Experience and Implications for Developing Nations (1983) (World Bank, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. M., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. New-product diffusion models. Handbooks in OR and MS (1993) 5(Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 349–408Chapter 8Google Scholar
  • Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marx-Goméz J., Rautenstrauch C. Predicting the return of scrapped products through simulation—A case study. Proc. 2nd Internat. Working Seminar on Re-use (1999) Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands:71–80Google Scholar
  • McLaren J., Parkinson S., Jackson T. Modelling material cascades—Frameworks for the environmental assessment of recycling systems. Resources, Conservation Recycling (2000) 31:83–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F. E. S. Xerox: Design for the environment. (1995) . Harvard Business School Case 9-749-022, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • OECD Pollution prevention and control, extended producer responsibility in the OECD area. (1996) . Phase 1 Report. OECD Environment Monographs No. 114, OCDE/GD(96)48, OECD, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Rose C. M., Beiter K. A., Ishii K., Masui K. Characterization of product end-of-life strategies to enhance recyclability. ASME Conf. Proc., Design for Manufacturing Sympos. (1998) September 13–16American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Atlanta, GA:1–9ASME Paper 98-DETC/DFM-5742Google Scholar
  • Savaskan R. C., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Channel choice and coordination in a remanufacturing environment. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):239–252LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Socolow R., Andrews C., Berkhout F., Thomas V.Industrial Ecology and Global Change (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swan P. L. Durability of consumption goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1970) 60:884–894Google Scholar
  • Toktay L. B., Wein L. M., Zenios S. A. Inventory management of remanufacturable products. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1412–1426LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tuxworth B., Wright M., East R., Travis L., Bullock H. Xeroxing all over the world. Green Futures (2001) 29:14Google Scholar
  • UBALife Cycle Assessment for Drinks Packaging Systems (1996) . Texte 19/96, Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Laan E., Salomon M., Dekker R., Van Wassenhove L. Inventory control in hybrid systems with remanufacturing. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):733–747LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Thiel J. Green marketing at Rank XEROX. (1994) . Harvard Business School Case 9-594-047, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.