Vicarious Learning in New Product Introductions in the Early Years of a Converging Market

References

• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:289–309Link, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. Persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J., Mezias S. Localized competition and the dynamics of the Manhattan hotel industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:580–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Haveman H. A. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry: 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:304–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Li S. X., Usher J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of a chain’s acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:766–801Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:92–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(December):676–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:239–262Link, Google Scholar
• Burns L. R., Wholey D. R. Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:106–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron C. A., Trivedi P. K.Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamley C., Gale D. Information revelation and strategic delay in a model of investment. Econometrica (1994) 62(5):1065–1085Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Stoneman P. Empirical studies of innovative activity. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (1995) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(September):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creech H. Digital camera buyer’s guide. Epinions.com (2005) December 8). http://www.epinions.com/buyers_guide/Digital_Cameras_buyers_guide_p1.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• The great convergence gambleEconomist, The (2000) 357(82):67–68Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):17–132Link, Google Scholar
• Future Image Report (1993) (Future Image Inc., San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Gamberdella A., Torrisi S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Res. Policy (1998) 20:465–483Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Rivkin J. W. How strategists really think: Tapping the power of analogy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2005) 83(4):54–65Google Scholar
• Gelman A., Rubin D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. (1992) 7:457–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geroski P. A. Innovation, technological opportunity and market structure. J. Indust. Econom. (1990) 38:586–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilks W. R., Richardson S., Spiegelhalter D. J.Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (1998) (Chapman & Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Greenstein S., Khanna T., Yoffie D. What does industry convergence mean? Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:29–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(October):967–988Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Taylor A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:54–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Ranger-Moore J. R., Banaszak-Holl J., Singh J. V. Competition and the evolution of organizational size distributions. Organizational Evolution (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 248–256Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:564–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Beckman C. M. When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:815–844Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 41:472–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:609–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:593–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(March):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–113Link, Google Scholar
• Kamien M. I., Schwartz N. Optimal capital accumulation and durable good production. Zeitschrift für National Ökonomie (1979) 37:25–43Google Scholar
• Kim J., Miner A. S. Crash test without dummies: A longitudinal study of interorganizational learning from failure experience in the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1984–1998. Best Paper Proc. (2000) Academy of Management Annual Meetings, Toronto, OntarioCrossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Hewlin P. F. Information cues and decision making: The effects of learning, momentum and social comparison in competing teams. Group Organ. Management (2002) 27(3):374–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Mezias S. J. Managing discontinuous change: A simulation study of organizational learning and entrepreneurial strategies. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:147–179Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G., Scott W. R., Blake J. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology (1988) (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res. Policy (2002) 31(2):247–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–86Link, Google Scholar
• McKendrick D. G. Global strategy and population level learning: The case of hard disk drives. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:307–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merklinger H. M. The Luminous Landscape discussion forum. (2005) December 8). http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/merklinger.shtmlGoogle Scholar
• Mezias S. J., Eisner B. Competition, imitation and innovation: An organizational learning approach. Adv. Strategic Management (1997) 14:261–294Google Scholar
• Mezias S. J., Glynn M. A. The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:77–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mezias S. J., Lant T. K., Baum J., Singh J. Mimetic learning and the evolution of organizational populations. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 179–193Google Scholar
• Miller D., Chen J. Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Soc. Forces (1996) 74(June):1209–1234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Mezias S. J. Ugly duckling no more: Past and future of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):88–99Link, Google Scholar
• Montgomery C., Wernerfelt B. Risk reduction and umbrella branding. J. Bus. (1992) 65(1):31–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C. Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(August):318–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(6, Summer Special Issue):187–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:153–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pogue D. Digital photos even a miser can enjoy. The New York Times (2005) Dec. 15):C1, 1Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H. Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:224–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rothwell R., Dodgson M., Rothwell R. Industrial innovation: Success, strategy, trends. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation (1994) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) 33–53Google Scholar
• Schmookler J. Economic sources of inventive activity. J. Econom. Hist. (1962) 22(March):l–20Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. P., van der Linde A. Bayesian measure of model complexity and fit. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (2002) 64(4):583–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Rosenkopf L. Organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:311–347Google Scholar
• Utterback J. M.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change (1994) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Angle H. L., Van de Ven A. H., Angle H. L., Poole M. S. The Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies (1989) (Harper & Row, Ballinger Division, New York) 3–30Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Kamakura W. A.Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoffie D. B.Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar