Size Really Matters—New Insights for Start-ups’ Survival

References

• Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000a) 45(3):425–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. (2000b) 21:317–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J. Communication networks in R&D laboratories, R&D management. The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation (1971) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 114–121[Reprinted in Ralph Katz, ed., 2004.]Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baum J., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:267–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:331–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter D., Esterling K., Lazer D. The strength of strong ties: A model of contact-making in policy networks with evidence from U.S. health politics. Rationality Soc. (2003) 15(4):411–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Suarez F., Utterback J. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):207–220Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen G. Strategy of reputation building as a key for success of young companies—Theoretical aspects and empirical analysis in the software field. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
• Cross R., Cummings J. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):928–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans D. The relationship between growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 35:567–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabbay S., Talmud I., Raz O. Corporate social capital and strategic isomorphism: The case of the Israeli software industry. Res. Sociol. Organ. (2001) 18:135–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladwell M.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (2002) (Back Bay Books, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Globes Israel technology guide, how Israeli high-tech happened. Globes (2005) . Retrieved May 1, 2005, http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=258771&fid=954Google Scholar
• Gloor P.Swarm Creativity—Competitive Advantage Through Collaborative Innovation Networks (2006) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Higgins M. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:127–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R.The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Lavie D. The interconnected firm: Evolution, strategy, and performance. (2004) . Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. Mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Maital S. The future of knowledge-based industry in Israel. (2006) . Working paper, S. Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, Technion, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
• Miner A. S., Amburgey T. L., Stearns T. M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):689–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Singh K. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):169–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Du R., Mela C. F. The effect of standardized information on firm survival and marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):263–274Link, Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke N. J. D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika (1991) 78(3):691–692Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECDInformation Technology Outlook 2000 (2000) (OECD Press, Paris, France) Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L., Owen-Smith J. Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Res. Sociol. Organ. (1999) 16:129–159Google Scholar
• Raz O. Social versus geographical influences on organizational strategy in Israeli software companies: Isomorphism in action. (2001) . M.Sc. thesis, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
• Romanelli E. Environments and strategies of organization start-up: Effects on early survival. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(3):369–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh K., Mitchell W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):99–115Google Scholar
• Suárez F. F., Utterback J. M. Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:415–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M. R&D policy in Israel: An overview and reassessment. (2000) . Working paper, The Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. NBER Working Paper No. W7930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzafrir S. S. The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. Internat. J. Human Resource Management (2005) 16(9):1600–1622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzafrir S. S., Harel G., Baruch Y., Dolan L. S. The consequences of emerging HRM practices for employees trust in their managers. Personnel Rev. (2004) 33(6):628–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D., Dodds P. S., Newman M. E. J. Identity and search in social networks. Science (2002) 296:1302–1305Crossref, Google Scholar
• White H.Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action (1992) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• White D. R., Houseman M. The navigability of strong ties: Small worlds, tie strength and network topology. Complexity (2002) 8(1):72–81Crossref, Google Scholar