Outsourcing via Service Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0612

References

  • Allon G., Federgruen A. Competition in service industries. (2005) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Anton J. J., Yao D. A. Split awards, procurement, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1989) 20:538–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anupindi R., Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Sci. (1993) 39:944–963LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D., Keeney R., Little J. A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12:136–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjaafar S., Cooper William L., Kim J. S. On the benefits of pooling in production-inventory systems. Management Sci. (2005) 51:548–565LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benjaafar S., Elhafsi M., de Véricourt F. Demand allocation in multi-product, multi-facility make-to-stock systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1431–1448LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition. Oper. Res. (2004) 52:868–886LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyaci T., Gallego G. Supply chain coordination in a market with customer service competition. Production Oper. Management (2004) 13:3–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyaci T., Ray S. Product differentiation and capacity cost interaction in time and price sensitive markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5:18–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buzacott J. A., Shanthikumar G.Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Zhang F. Obtaining fast service in a queueing system via performance-based allocation of demand. Management Sci. (2006a) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Zhang F. Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2006b) 52(6):881–896LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Auctioning supply contracts. (2004) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J., Yao D. D., Zheng S. Optimal replenishment and rework with multiple unreliable supply sources. Oper. Res. (2001) 49:430–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper L. G., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. Marketing share models. Marketing. Handbooks in OR/MS (1993) 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chapter 6Google Scholar
  • Dixit A. Strategic behavior in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77:891–898Google Scholar
  • Elahi E. Outsourcing via service competition. (2007) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Elahi E., Benjaafar S., Donohue K. Inventory competition in make-to-stock systems. (2003) . Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W. J. Supply contract competition and sourcing strategies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2:350–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppen G. D. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Sci. (1979) 25:498–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farlow D., Schmidt G., Tsay A. Supplier management at Sun Microsystems. (1996) . Stanford Business School Case, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Fong D. K. H., Gempesaw V. M., Ord J. K. Analysis of a dual sourcing inventory model with normal unit demand and Erlang mixture lead times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 120:97–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans N. Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48:207–221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert S., Weng Z. K. Incentive effects favor non-competing queues in a service system: The principal-agent perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 44:1662–1669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green J. R., Stokey N. L. A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. (1983) 91:349–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Y. (2004) . Personal communication. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A.Y., Li L., Ng S. M. Price and delivery logistics competition in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1139–1153LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall J., Porteus E. Customer service competition in capacitated systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2:144–165LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalai E., Kamien M., Rubinovitch M. Optimal service speeds in a competitive environment. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1154–1163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalra A., Shi M. Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20:170–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karjalainen R. The newsboy game. (1992) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys (1999) 13:227–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad K., Schlesinger H. Risk-aversion in rent-seeking and rent-augmenting games. Econom. J. (1997) 107:1671–1683Google Scholar
  • Kotler P.Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control (1984) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Laffont J., Tirole J. Auctioning incentive contracts. J. Political Econom. (1987) 95:921–937CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lazear E. P., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:841–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Q., Ha A. Y. Accurate response, reactive capacity and inventory competition. (2003) . Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCardle K. F. The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. (1997) 45:54–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice. Oper. Res. (2001a) 49:646–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan S., van Ryzin G. A stocking retail assortment under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. (2001b) 49:334–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Lit. (1987) 25:699–738Google Scholar
  • Moinzadeh K., Nahmias S. A continuous review model for an inventory system with two supply modes. Management Sci. (1988) 26:483–494Google Scholar
  • Monahan G. E. The structure of equilibria in market share attraction models. Management Sci. (1987) 33:228–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Monahan G. E., Sobel M. Risk-sensitive dynamic market share attraction games. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 20:149–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. Competitive marketing strategies: Game-theoretic models. Marketing. Handbooks in OR/MS (1993) 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chapter 4Google Scholar
  • Netessine S., Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:329–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nitzan S. Modelling rent-seeking contests. Eur. J. Political Econom. (1994) 10:41–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Normile D. Taiwan’s United Microelectronics Corp. looks to partnerships to improve its foundry business. Electronic Bus. (2003) 29:60–69Google Scholar
  • Nti K. O. Comparative statics of contests and rent-seeking games. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1997) 38:43–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Res. Logist. (1988) 35:397–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PeopleSoft PeopleSoft supplier rating system. (2004) . Promotional material. Retrieved July 2004, http://www.peoplesoft.comGoogle Scholar
  • Perez-Castrillo J. D., Verdier T. A general analysis of rent-seeking games. Public Choice (1992) 73:335–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramasesh R. V., Ord J. K., Hayya J. C., Pan Pan A. C. Sole versus dual sourcing in stochastic lead-time (s, Q) inventory models. Management Sci. (1991) 37:428–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts B. Ups and downs of contract manufacturing. Electronic Bus. (2003) 29:36–50Google Scholar
  • Rosenblatt M. J., Herer Y. T., Hefter I. Note. An acquisition policy for a single item multi-supplier system. Management Sci. (1998) 44:S96–S100LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross C. F., Shevlin R., Herbert L. 2003: Financial services outsourcing will grow 10%. (2003) . Forrester research reportGoogle Scholar
  • Seshadri S. Bidding for contests. Management Sci. (1995) 41:561–576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seshadri S., Zemel E. Supply intelligence. (2003) . Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Skaperdas S. Contest success functions. Econom. Theory (1996) 7:283–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan J. M., Shanthikumar J. G. Supplier diversification: Effect of discrete demand. Oper. Res. Lett. (1999) 24:213–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talluri K., van Ryzin G. J.The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tullock G., Buchanan J. M., Tollison R. D., Tullock G. Rent-seeking as a negative-sum game. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (1980) (Texas A&M University Press)97–112Google Scholar
  • Wang Y., Gerchak Y. Supply chain coordination when demand is shelf-space dependent. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3:82–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whittemore A. S., Saunders S. Optimal inventory under stochastic demand with two supply options. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1977) 32:293–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zipkin P. H.Foundations of Inventory Management (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.