Modularity and the Impact of Buyer–Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0630

References

  • Achrol R. S. Changes in the theory of interorganizational relations in marketing: Towards a network paradigm. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(Spring):56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asanuma B. Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. (1989) 3(1):1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Automotive NewsAutomotive News: The 100-Year Almanac and 1996 Market Data Book (1996) . American Automobile Centennial, 1896–1996; V. 1, April 24, 1996. Automotive News, Detroit, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Automobile QuarterlyThe American Car Since 1775: The Most Complete Survey of the American Automobile Ever Published (1971) (L. S. Bailey, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baker W. E. Market networks and corporate behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 96(3):589–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E., Faulkner R. R., Fisher G. A. Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(2):147–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules. Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Hansen M. T. The Red Queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):139–157Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Autonomy in a social topology. Amer. J. Sociology (1980) 85(4):892–925CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R. E., Uekusa M.Industrial Organization in Japan (1976) (The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cook K. S. Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. Sociol. Quart. (1977) 18:62–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M. Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43(5):721–739CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dussauge P., Garrette B., Mitchell W. Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America, and Asia. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(2):99–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. (1996a) 7(6):649–666LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996b) 17(4):271–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyke A. L.Dyke’s Automobile and Gasoline Engine Encyclopedia: The Elementary Principles, Construction, Operation and Repair of Automobiles, Gasoline Engines and Automobile Electric Systems, Including Trucks, Tractors, and Motorcycles, Simple, Thorough and Practical (1923) (The Goodheart-Willcox Company Inc., Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Eccles R. G. The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:335–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1962) 27:31–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj Sendil K., Levinthal Daniel. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargiulo M., Benassi M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(2):183–196LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Special issue):93–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust—The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunnell J.Standard Catalog of American Cars, 1946–1975 (1982) (Krause Publications, Iola, WI) Google Scholar
  • Guo G. Event-history analysis of left-truncated data. Sociol. Methodology (1993) 23:217–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutierrez R. G. Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models. Stata J. (2002) 2(1):22–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T. Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104(1):126–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G. Do modular products lead to modular organizations? Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(6):501–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy E. D.The Automobile Industry; The Coming of Age of Capitalism’s Favorite Child (1941) (Reynal & Hitchcock, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kimes B. R.Standard Catalog of American Cars, 1805–1942 (1989) 2nd ed.(Krause Publications, Iola, WI) Google Scholar
  • Langlois R. N., Robertson P. L. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Res. Policy (1992) 21(4):297–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. Dynamics of interorganizational attachments—Auditor-client relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(3):345–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucke Charles Edward, Willhöfft Friederich Otto. Carburetor Design: A Preliminary Study of the State of the Art (NACA Report 11) (1917) (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Mandel L.From Harrah’s Automobile CollectionAmerican Cars: From Harrah’s Automobile Collection (1982) (Stewart, Tabori & Chang, New York) Google Scholar
  • Martin X., Swaminathan A., Mitchell W. Organizational evolution in the interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):566–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mikkola Juliana Hsuan. Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter-firm learning. R&D Management (2003) 33(4):439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Amburgey T. L., Stearns T. M. Interorganizational linkages and population-dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):689–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W., Singh K. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):95–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monteverde K., Teece D. J. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(1):206–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78:311–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newcomb T. P., Spurr R. T.A Technical History of the Motor Car (1989) (A. Hilger, Bristol, UK) Google Scholar
  • Page V. W.The Modern Gasoline Automobile: Its Design, Construction, Operation and Maintenance (1918) (Norman W. Henley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Peterson T., Marsden P. V. Time-aggregation bias in continuous-time hazard-rate models. Sociol. Methodology (1991) 21:263–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockart Scott. Experience quality and competition. (2003) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Singh K., Mitchell W. Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):169–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith P. H.Wheels Within Wheels; A Short History of American Motor Manufacturing (1968) (Funk & Wagnalls, New York) Google Scholar
  • Spence M. Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87:355–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):668–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United States Bureau of the CensusHistorical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (1989) (Kraus International Publications, White Plains, NY) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickery S., Calantone R., Droge C. Supply chain flexibility: An empirical study. J. Supply Chain Management (1999) 35(3):16–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. J. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):109–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36(1):453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wonnacott T. H., Wonnacott R. J.Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics (1977) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Hesterly W. S. The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):209–222LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.