Pushing Quality Improvement Along Supply Chains

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0634

References

  • Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46:776–789LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bollapragada S., Morton T. E. Myopic heuristics for the random yield problem. Oper. Res. (1999) 47:713–722LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carter J. R., Ellram L. M. The impact of interorganizational alliances in improving supplier quality. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management (1994) 24:15–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grosfeld-Nir A., Gerchak Y., He Q.-M. Manufacturing to order with random yield and costly inspection. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:761–767LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L. Lot sizing to reduce capacity utilization in a production process with defective items, process corrections, and rework. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1314–1328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Rosenblatt M. J. Simultaneous determination of production cycle and inspection schedules in a production system. Management Sci. (1987) 33:1125–1136LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lim W. S. Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information. Management Sci. (2001) 47:709–715LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagar V., Rajan M. V. The revenue implications of financial and operational measures of product quality. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76(4):495–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahmias S., Moinzadeh K. Lot sizing with randomly graded yields. Oper. Res. (1997) 46:974–986LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nandakumar P., Datar S. M., Akella R. Models for measuring and accounting for cost of conformance. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1–16LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porteus E. L. Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:137–144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porteus E. L. The impact of inspection delay on process and inspection lot sizing. Management Sci. (1990) 36:999–1007LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rajaram K., Karmarkar U. S. Product cycling with uncertain yields: Analysis and application to the process industry. Oper. Res. (2002) 50:680–691LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reyniers D. J., Tapiero C. S. The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1581–1589LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenblatt M. J., Lee H. L. Economic production cycles with imperfect production processes. IIE Trans. (1986) 18:48–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roos G. It takes quality to be preferred by world’s biggest chipmaker. Purchasing (2001) 130(22):21–23Google Scholar
  • Snee R. D., Hoerl R. W.Leading Six Sigma: A Step-by-Step Guide Based on Experience with GE and Other Six Sigma Companies (2003) (Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Starbird S. A. Acceptance sampling, imperfect production, and the optimality of zero defects. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1997) 44:515–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tagaras G., Lee H. L. Economic models for vendor evaluation with quality cost analysis. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1531–1543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trommer D. Training is key to quality—group provides venue for supplier education. Electronic Engrg. Times (1996) November 11):76Google Scholar
  • Wang Y. Z., Gerchak Y. Periodic review production models with variable capacity, random yield, and uncertain demand. Management Sci. (1996) 42:130–137LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yano C. A., Lee H. L. Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Oper. Res. (1995) 43:311–334LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.